Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1204725pxf; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:18:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsEBq5uvN4zXCau3MYVhkOf9FszqLtwmTpXs6xM8sy2EPlCkfWhgQoFqkUtfnS51yj7g7N X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c24b:: with SMTP id bl11mr3041953ejb.80.1616141928110; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:18:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616141928; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pyZd0jX82Q0SDSypFGNgnMPbcPCB+bZcSnTsJbFgmzOl4WMarXizsCbTXJFYUWrMS5 MGoga34cbRcbkCiR8rsZmNrKUVGcanv8BUyzJ1t9rF/O7VTkSG9NbQR4e01oRSLD7TB7 SGkcIlaj9Hk2iL0tSfg5ib7usVWT96QCYu5Goe7TPorZISI+9/OuGH5j3fyOUtSPnW47 HMBMTD6KY5Uc49dkdWsoJ/0OmAQO9LWIgmRFpCzuT29PEaAnJGTtBTbiXGfZocQr6c4/ Xo/9sl+FOzySMqvQaSPvvbXFoQo1LK+9RHCOmd4RlZxuld//wi0fOy5KI21/+hXsrEaM hvFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=GPmISnyfdyOHYuw/DXCIruI/XlrV8vtOEMpbuKM3mnk=; b=NIg31N//IFOUD9oDIy63fMpVAddSl/31sxkG1/OABxUvTrg7LV+YEtISbW5f3J2Viy KHdXx2jlilcdcocgfRfX2sXIVWNXY4JjcDe6B88aPAg9v/k0W/HhXhyptEbpZceTHgPF KWUu3JtNCmib3+IBRNIiuiazFEoofdKIpfum/uKXzDbhPI2e0M0PudzjKLHscmXYETHl YlZCCHGC2cs858AJoDHOpve0UayE9oAqTzuFMcvuBbouKBaSpv5WN/o/K2CHLfjfOoHg DfNIvPNPg0bd7qMQ3+rfYRF/bhVdsGnXpJtHQ4ipgv9o1dJUUBiKDdi7ARjNluES91Ry iMtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ilXJ81es; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lj22si3716223ejb.614.2021.03.19.01.18.25; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ilXJ81es; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234260AbhCSIR2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:17:28 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:41948 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234240AbhCSIRG (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:17:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616141825; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GPmISnyfdyOHYuw/DXCIruI/XlrV8vtOEMpbuKM3mnk=; b=ilXJ81eslHb/SiQIDua2vabDE9ha2gB6iPbKxBrnNJ1pXx0amn0t/aKOBEcYgt2GTOBxwr QTNkXSlmZDQxwobd0LMmbfxAvCcAAS5bM5p5dCW9mbZWzKF088sY3/T8NY7NKclRnwlDqr pO3idR4dArC5rbx4lHMzfqeRsaFLmQ4= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-284-IUBakxxxN-2fJJyVVPFQCw-1; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:17:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: IUBakxxxN-2fJJyVVPFQCw-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id m8so16797085edv.11 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:17:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GPmISnyfdyOHYuw/DXCIruI/XlrV8vtOEMpbuKM3mnk=; b=aHBofg2orUTW0RNmOSWHyM0wS8wJkeKTgci67ss+YLYFJiojSlCm53G8VmUTmw9PUh smrw4yWg/l9iBK6PwsnqnGZRaUkcpgZLhjVf89RdLn530ui5ItW1WvXOJvhYVvQC4nMg EL3MHMVSkG+/nJuWtoc3OruwKISvpgvxGAtVu+mTbtIsAOIcOoMnBmJmPEeqQ/HyBDok 1U1PspSyfRRk5moyul/Zgnup1yGc6rWNksAGfumFwBIpsonNVyGORIrMmAKj9IUgYT3q HfsXF0m+S56ZLiRgaIwkufaE1TsmozwIyoHzOo+xZkZPPeaKN8eZW1NfN5FjCuuq+Jo6 ahtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xE+mzr70sHMCdZ0qhUgUvAeyVcjFKTe8W/gVdqdEdxghLJKI+ NGEjUXfuEf+JHYDsJq9225S4AmDODNLVJFL3X2nEfXnRNc/6qHTUxcLfI4kRPkiiC8G1kt50hsY HOPsulRnLjdSWotS6e3NH679eG9fvR/i5tAL+W9agMbonGRupkyIC1/+nTSn5YoX7Zj5/fFKA9j uJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2661:: with SMTP id ci1mr2901604ejc.403.1616141821357; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:17:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2661:: with SMTP id ci1mr2901589ejc.403.1616141821192; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q26sm3273413eja.45.2021.03.19.01.17.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/kvm: add get_msr_index_features To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito , Andrew Jones Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Vitaly Kuznetsov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210318145629.486450-1-eesposit@redhat.com> <20210318170316.6vah7x2ws4bimmdf@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <52d09cdf-3819-0cd8-5812-387febaa1ab3@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:16:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52d09cdf-3819-0cd8-5812-387febaa1ab3@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/03/21 09:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote: >> >> I'm not sure why the original kvm selftests authors decided to do this >> internal stuff, but we should either kill that or avoid doing stuff like >> this. > > I need this include because of the KVM_DEV_PATH macro, to get the kvm_fd. > No other reason for including it in this test. I'll take care of moving that macro to the non-internal kvm_util.h header, thanks. No need to do anything, I'll send the pull request later today. Paolo