Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:01:55 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc:     "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
        "tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
        "rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
        "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        "rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
        "mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
        "msys.mizuma@gmail.com" <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
        "valentin.schneider@arm.com" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
        "juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "sudeep.holla@arm.com" <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        "aubrey.li@linux.intel.com" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, "xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
        "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
        "guodong.xu@linaro.org" <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
        yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
        "Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
        "linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>,
        "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a
 die
Message-ID: <YFR2kwakbcGiI37w@kroah.com>
References: <20210319041618.14316-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
 <20210319041618.14316-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
 <YFRGIedW1fUlnmi+@kroah.com>
 <eb48302277f3436eb9899032e6b0bf1c@hisilicon.com>
 <20210319093616.00001879@Huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210319093616.00001879@Huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 09:36:16AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 06:57:08 +0000
> "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 7:35 PM
> > > To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> > > Cc: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will@kernel.org;
> > > rjw@rjwysocki.net; vincent.guittot@linaro.org; bp@alien8.de;
> > > tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; lenb@kernel.org; peterz@infradead.org;
> > > dietmar.eggemann@arm.com; rostedt@goodmis.org; bsegall@google.com;
> > > mgorman@suse.de; msys.mizuma@gmail.com; valentin.schneider@arm.com; Jonathan
> > > Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; juri.lelli@redhat.com;
> > > mark.rutland@arm.com; sudeep.holla@arm.com; aubrey.li@linux.intel.com;
> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; xuwei (O) <xuwei5@huawei.com>;
> > > Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>; guodong.xu@linaro.org; yangyicong
> > > <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Liguozhu (Kenneth) <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>;
> > > linuxarm@openeuler.org; hpa@zytor.com
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within
> > > a die
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:16:15PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:  
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst  
> > > b/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst  
> > > > index b90dafc..f9d3745 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst
> > > > @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ core_id:
> > > >  	identifier (rather than the kernel's).  The actual value is
> > > >  	architecture and platform dependent.
> > > >
> > > > +cluster_id:
> > > > +
> > > > +	the Cluster ID of cpuX.  Typically it is the hardware platform's
> > > > +	identifier (rather than the kernel's).  The actual value is
> > > > +	architecture and platform dependent.
> > > > +
> > > >  book_id:
> > > >
> > > >  	the book ID of cpuX. Typically it is the hardware platform's
> > > > @@ -56,6 +62,14 @@ package_cpus_list:
> > > >  	human-readable list of CPUs sharing the same physical_package_id.
> > > >  	(deprecated name: "core_siblings_list")
> > > >
> > > > +cluster_cpus:
> > > > +
> > > > +	internal kernel map of CPUs within the same cluster.
> > > > +
> > > > +cluster_cpus_list:
> > > > +
> > > > +	human-readable list of CPUs within the same cluster.
> > > > +
> > > >  die_cpus:
> > > >
> > > >  	internal kernel map of CPUs within the same die.  
> > > 
> > > Why are these sysfs files in this file, and not in a Documentation/ABI/
> > > file which can be correctly parsed and shown to userspace?  
> > 
> > Well. Those ABIs have been there for much a long time. It is like:
> > 
> > [root@ceph1 topology]# ls
> > core_id  core_siblings  core_siblings_list  physical_package_id thread_siblings  thread_siblings_list
> > [root@ceph1 topology]# pwd
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu100/topology
> > [root@ceph1 topology]# cat core_siblings_list
> > 64-127
> > [root@ceph1 topology]#
> > 
> > > 
> > > Any chance you can fix that up here as well?  
> > 
> > Yes. we will send a separate patch to address this, which won't
> > be in this patchset. This patchset will base on that one.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also note that "list" is not something that goes in sysfs, sysfs is "one
> > > value per file", and a list is not "one value".  How do you prevent
> > > overflowing the buffer of the sysfs file if you have a "list"?
> > >   
> > 
> > At a glance, the list is using "-" rather than a real list
> > [root@ceph1 topology]# cat core_siblings_list
> > 64-127
> > 
> > Anyway, I will take a look if it has any chance to overflow.
> 
> It could in theory be alternate CPUs as comma separated list.
> So it's would get interesting around 500-1000 cpus (guessing).
> 
> Hopefully no one has that crazy a cpu numbering scheme but it's possible
> (note that cluster is fine for this, but I guess it might eventually
> happen for core-siblings list (cpus within a package).
> 
> Shouldn't crash or anything like that but might terminate early.

We have a broken sysfs api already for listing LED numbers that has had
to be worked around in the past, please do not create a new one with
that same problem, we should learn from them :)

thanks,

greg k-h