Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1359572pxf; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 05:41:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzSar+9HQv8QvSKfWeck8slTyVmNQjlwOEtgj2IfFYCJu68+0l8L85Z0UdI6LpfsOHjZbu X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:10c1:: with SMTP id rv1mr4145089ejb.5.1616157674773; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 05:41:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616157674; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tXruWR+3DNhU7sVeahCl4wfDJRqgPl+iTdJFRt2RWfyLMenyYEVHpXyjm8CEA2XFyp sLkG81+hmJnGx5/ovvqNiei08BOdv5y/x33SWbq4Z1E82dchQH6plP7lfXMCiTsKP4M1 EIXCHKtnDHWuDByV+ah0goEk6vCMnPnrwnW3CjN1LIyfcOm3OhQTzn9dwd0E51wg68XJ +7v149taau8FYhLw/FQ2DDz+YkzwIP/FBFxQfWvgUJhD4TMUwlA/rNe+xKKD4EGJLyNB Xc/mxUYt9n3QPPNoEYGfrMYVmlekzMEylbPsD64zA6GCA/IFH4xi2pPNUT0yXk1FgyrO cq8A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=wnOGeRXsb09V5bqVWNPybyekdhF/TuqN0KaiDMI5/nc=; b=K+oEkH1hD0I5mGBO249AgHTm8N/AA0Xy5AHhRs2H2zC21nSAE4yyQE6laKYFgwXSpJ auIxkWy3P2pvpuQQNL3SWMy2ZQa2NICYUb0bDi0aOEcYyIbJuNSepqVj55XE64sC51zo pEVnY+1/odZxsSJaw7Xg/wXL/6wbVasxPLlhGuYzzNbHHrLz5aCgXBW4FSYOgN/IGgmP XOYKLoDaEzpWsP6gqGrjQq4FUMZQr+fViy497pTKxp8BfO0gz8jhqKHuNJPTUxrjuYbN ktZNYLU0As5Zb3S7K6WKK3Eb6cYOYGMvHbWJn/0Nsc9Z6bXmTPqX5BjuaWpS0z+Xc8Zg Rxuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si4132887edc.316.2021.03.19.05.40.52; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 05:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229978AbhCSMjd (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:39:33 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:13648 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229826AbhCSMjC (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:39:02 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F23Kp26y5zmZdn; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:36:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.102.248] (10.67.102.248) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:38:52 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] perf annotate: Fix sample events lost in stdio mode To: Namhyung Kim CC: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Yao Jin , , , linux-kernel References: <20210317094409.94293-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> From: Yang Jihong Message-ID: <62845bff-fbca-e1d3-ce41-d7b925c0046b@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:38:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.102.248] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/3/18 14:13, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 6:44 PM Yang Jihong wrote: >> >> In hist__find_annotations function, since different hist_entry may point to same >> symbol, we free notes->src to signal already processed this symbol in stdio mode; >> when annotate, entry will skipped if notes->src is NULL to avoid repeated output. >> >> However, there is a problem, for example, run the following command: >> >> # perf record -e branch-misses -e branch-instructions -a sleep 1 >> >> perf.data file contains different types of sample event. >> >> If the same IP sample event exists in branch-misses and branch-instructions, >> this event uses the same symbol. When annotate branch-misses events, notes->src >> corresponding to this event is set to null, as a result, when annotate >> branch-instructions events, this event is skipped and no annotate is output. >> >> Solution of this patch is to remove zfree in hists__find_annotations and >> change sort order to "dso,symbol" to avoid duplicate output when different >> processes correspond to the same symbol. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong >> --- >> >> Changes since v5: >> - Add Signed-off-by tag. >> >> Changes since v4: >> - Use the same sort key "dso,symbol" in branch stack mode. >> >> Changes since v3: >> - Modify the first line of comments. >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Remove zfree in hists__find_annotations. >> - Change sort order to avoid duplicate output. >> >> Changes since v1: >> - Change processed flag variable from u8 to bool. >> >> tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 13 ++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c >> index a23ba6bb99b6..92c55f292c11 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c >> @@ -374,13 +374,6 @@ static void hists__find_annotations(struct hists *hists, >> } else { >> hist_entry__tty_annotate(he, evsel, ann); >> nd = rb_next(nd); >> - /* >> - * Since we have a hist_entry per IP for the same >> - * symbol, free he->ms.sym->src to signal we already >> - * processed this symbol. >> - */ >> - zfree(¬es->src->cycles_hist); >> - zfree(¬es->src); >> } >> } >> } >> @@ -619,6 +612,12 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv) >> >> setup_browser(true); >> >> + /* >> + * Events of different processes may correspond to the same >> + * symbol, we do not care about the processes in annotate, >> + * set sort order to avoid repeated output. >> + */ >> + sort_order = "dso,symbol"; > > At this point, I think there's not much value having separate > setup_sorting() for branch mode. > Yes, two setup_sorting can be combined into one setup_sorting(NULL), the v7 patch has been submitted, please check it :) https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1399031/ Thanks, Yang > Thanks, > Namhyung > > >> if ((use_browser == 1 || annotate.use_stdio2) && annotate.has_br_stack) { >> sort__mode = SORT_MODE__BRANCH; >> if (setup_sorting(annotate.session->evlist) < 0) >> -- >> 2.30.GIT >> > . >