Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "elaine.zhang" <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend (another take)
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:42:58 +0100
Message-ID: <4641414.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher>
In-Reply-To: <5448054.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher>
References: <5448054.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thursday, March 18, 2021 7:06:54 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The previous attempt to address the issue tackled by this series, commit
> 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers
> suspend") was incorrect, because it introduced a rather nasty race condition
> into __rpm_callback(), so let's revert it (patch [1/2]).
> 
> Instead, let's avoid suspending the suppliers immediately after dropping the
> PM-runtime references to them and do that later, when the status of the
> consumer has changed to RPM_SUSPENDED.
> 
> Please see the patch changelogs for details.
> 
> Elaine, please test this series on the system where you saw the original
> problem.

The above still applies.

The v2 is sent because of some updates in the second patch, plus the tags from Ulf.

Thanks!