Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>, cang@codeaurora.org,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
        Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER..." 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
References: <cover.1616113283.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
 <56662082b6a17b448f40d87df7e52b45a5998c2a.1616113283.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
 <88730ac9-d9c5-d758-d761-8c549c488aab@intel.com>
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Message-ID: <ed3b5ad6-4396-d861-9bb2-40c05f4a8ece@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:35:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <88730ac9-d9c5-d758-d761-8c549c488aab@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/19/21 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> It would also be good if you could re-base on linux-next.

Hmm ... my understanding is that patches should be prepared on top of 
the for-next branch of the maintainer a patch is sent to, in this case 
the for-next branch of 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git.

Thanks,

Bart.