Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:31:57 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc:     0day robot <lkp@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkp@lists.01.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
        zhengjun.xing@intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
        Adam Nichols <adam@grimm-co.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [seq_file]  5fd6060e50:  stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per_sec -49.1%
 regression
Message-ID: <202103191230.5054A14247@keescook>
References: <20210315174851.622228-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <20210319140742.GC30349@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210319140742.GC30349@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:07:42PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -49.1% regression of stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per_sec due to commit:

Well, so it can be seen. ;) Though I feel slightly better that it's stress-ng
instead of a "normal" workload.

Thanks for the report!

-- 
Kees Cook