Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:34:24 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        jbaron@akamai.com, ardb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        sumit.garg@linaro.org, oliver.sang@intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
        jeyu@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] static_call: Fix static_call_update() sanity check
Message-ID: <YFT8wDrWvfpQoIWw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20210318113156.407406787@infradead.org>
 <20210318113610.739542434@infradead.org>
 <20210318161308.vu3dhezp2lczch6f@treble>
 <YFOGvmWiJUDOHy7D@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YFSfwimq/VLmo1Lw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20210319140005.7ececb11@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210319140005.7ececb11@gandalf.local.home>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:00:05PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Would making __exit code the same as init code work? That is, load it just
> like module init code is loaded, and free it when the init code is freed

As stated, yes. But it must then also identify as init through
within_module_init().