Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp2090975pxf; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:18:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZH7TT75inkU2ejL6rrpDlP8ha8hQEajn7iIOpv3I76NtoelgpUPW6A5+3QW8cbafOVRfR X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:489b:: with SMTP id v27mr9246177ejq.1.1616239112300; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:18:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616239112; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EvNm/ibOxbS8JMlVv9CXwTeM1WTfw8GVH1AadRc+hqKCtvADW1CdEl1JEbdAtTjyCq V7/RTKVlKYNwN2KslkWYl86q4cjF/eSk3Ktv+1dK/g7vv5DROEmxgn4XBWRLKjk7Fifz /3wiJz0fz3Wimb1y7yGJx3Hl4pv3EXYP2fFMax5eYGsOMxVEDRLa8gGN4NBFp5o0JT6d v9CEueXuUbJVKPfnuUsTGPoYcCYUoF9JhjIX5MzIOHc8sM6q6Amxr5Q0J3vyLMwRfPFa A1kgyqZTQQLYJ2l7eXiwUGe/7GyLRSeXN394djIpzSLqrMEuZBVJB0mETrUGBKlLuMQw kDfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=xaGlk2i4k4xjrgxv5GCvNM+Vcz1bxTHvvKwGlfw7Mxg=; b=bwY+TMUn++EsNOhreOZiOfUj4XBj0OEyj9TFlLwzXZDz8pCQYc65KTdM6iNWUL8sJ6 CdKsuAd9l32XqAvVZvEy0Ml+iun8ag8qojvNc1avtCTer2PHNya7rp4wFl6eVydxyYb9 2dS9lYiDtJfYZSnhwYbyi4RhLO8d8RCLUyUWoZlIamBVYXSYVdfjMNW+odMPbZnMH7y3 t4VFFsOOQaXTgB32p/sTCsnsbdp5rhr7zStT0VzMP//Coi17X9kqm7uhH4l+/snRTN/m l90RSNU10UF7HqX1nmPkEzmdIqX/XGFvzyYhvdRE0PpVH60HHcFreUMPyE/ZinUMtGUT rC4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XLrdFwzH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id du1si5623864ejc.12.2021.03.20.04.18.09; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XLrdFwzH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231151AbhCTLNB (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:13:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39282 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230015AbhCTLMM (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:12:12 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 541A9C06178A; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 03:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id c17so10356262ilj.7; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 03:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xaGlk2i4k4xjrgxv5GCvNM+Vcz1bxTHvvKwGlfw7Mxg=; b=XLrdFwzHA9lCbJzFer+aRn0FKRE/KKbYX4paLFhRsCU2OWn6bg2V7Yt782lecLwIZk 3xS9SaJa8ecMvkxrRrr96vjN/5P1nrseX36JbMKoUgG1XoQNf4yILRr08n9P4dEAfVFN ndy4fyuIlVjfPCPb0nTDXTp9/yZ98DMLPTEmc6Tu4u2WC4ydAlu2VyjCOKNGhhXI/W2s GBKYw49T0i/luT3ABpb9oQcw5F/5XFbwNiSbXBknAC+ifddjsWO/UXPe88yJBfBeVWKC xt53hOZwHqc6xDLuhN4pc90scHhqsAZEdskl3yoVoGdd07GWJGYzw1ntC6TizMIDIweT QiMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xaGlk2i4k4xjrgxv5GCvNM+Vcz1bxTHvvKwGlfw7Mxg=; b=lnw//37UHz+DnQbZD8lQaFYQTtvUwf6wSXiRJaVBFG9/OMO5m9H5UnwT6m86sjJiPe q7DkEYF6xfu3C3iThF0wBdWJeRrj5SJquyg3LPkxENp53y4XzaJxgfo/7/XUevAewPbf Jm7ldOl0ZB2PJQWub1Z8o4EmHoZdzBf9r3ofvL3JZiutxFUlSD9lG1w8nW4ARwZxUYrT jLdfzJ2StO9X9e/BQXBaYKiScCfKNgmlJ978DOj0O9uS72fzirFNT2ULwtmyDabxmWcn rhvz2jaBFGXVemAfkntH8QAVTesl5YVyxNDk0RddiMZsRjcsdRptv7E5YbE+hHtcZm52 hnRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305GlFXow+kdY5w8wp3D6irHr/ejPG3aHW0zTNsjM6qBmrNtfJu QQizhdZGZxN2gfaQvXzaI+3I5+SP7yPfJA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:a547:: with SMTP id r7mr15162795pgu.186.1616223211846; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 23:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2405:201:600d:a089:1ce8:18d9:6e3d:8c29? ([2405:201:600d:a089:1ce8:18d9:6e3d:8c29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm7513423pfq.184.2021.03.19.23.53.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 23:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC] scripts: kernel-doc: avoid warnings due to initial commented lines in file To: Jonathan Corbet , Lukas Bulwahn Cc: Markus Heiser , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <20210309125324.4456-1-yashsri421@gmail.com> <8959bf29-9ee1-6a1d-da18-f440232864f3@darmarit.de> <871rcg2p8g.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <878s6kto3g.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <87o8fgpbpx.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Aditya Message-ID: <99a21e10-266e-b997-7048-c29a570afe0b@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 12:23:25 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87o8fgpbpx.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/3/21 11:48 pm, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Lukas Bulwahn writes: > >> Yeah, and as this line-counting is really just a poor man's >> heuristics, we might just be better to really turn this heuristics >> into a dedicated cleanup warning script, then we can check for more >> indicators, such as "does it contain the word Copyright" somewhere in >> the kernel-doc comment, which tells us even more that this is not a >> kernel-doc as we would expect it. > > I really don't think we need that kind of heuristic. The format of > kerneldoc comments is fairly rigid; it shouldn't be too hard to pick out > the /** comments that don't fit that format, right? Am I missing > something there? > > Thanks, > > jon > Thanks for the inputs Lukas and Jonathan. I shall try to come up with something. Thanks Aditya