Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210319175950.509fcbd0@canb.auug.org.au> <YFS1h6h+71sRlwFR@osiris>
 <20210320162734.1630cc55@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210320162734.1630cc55@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:07:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72nKJBVsuvqr17qa0xnkQTUz9aaAGRi8SfXZAn-G=RYQXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 19
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@rothwell.id.au>
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
        Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>,
        Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
        Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@gmail.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 6:33 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@rothwell.id.au> wrote:
>
> Daniel Axtens reported the same breakage on powerpc.  I bisected it to
> the same commit.  More experimentation shows that if you reverse just
> the change to include/linux/moduleparam.h the above warnings go away.
> So
>
> -#define MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN (256 - sizeof(unsigned long))
> +#define MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN (64 - sizeof(unsigned long))
>
> fixes it up.  Not sure what that does to the rust support ...

Sorry for that, and thanks a lot for taking a look. For the Rust
support I had to increase a few limits, mainly the symbol length. Let
me check and I'll report back.

Cheers,
Miguel