Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp2110240pxf; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:57:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/Anxu+N1q9jmQ/dXUkHmbtOpsAh+CZYMrwk/RBljWaGLujIJxLEWffOlxmWpcd/grRa5A X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c405:: with SMTP id u5mr9427622ejz.341.1616241441154; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:57:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616241441; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RJXKL0agVMxgpefuPt8t4xrZ0aNyxiYARN07QZyrwGagAci12iLzwH2TB47cSAxh0z VMXvGrHin9AQE928g/fkVaIZpAQ2nt6Wdi0bZurKAtkklrfyn5UoL6hGohb7p2zYLFqd FSBqCDxB4aZtAY/4tp2LkEO4EkGHvS7HrrK1v5YL9dAE6LocqtkuEjrnCFc+hYWWOevt Fl9gayjXC7+8MEkH27t4rqmHGGb+vztwAkHiyeEyR+xOV/0ihDZo1SRMBFbeZIxuqwzO LzbPWYRZJK/xUjVQIpMHDBLkL1yQqHz540FvNVrrTsOCmMPiT+ez7RbEFef8mqgraLk8 eJUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=upKgYpLhw0Ek4ixn296pmN1Kx5Zf4O7D2MaNjJZf7Ag=; b=0e721/vE/IpBoCxQYEjdGCJF9Pn6sG23jxldcI2DnQFKqHcj034/O4o4wOq3V9Hv2I LCGhrdBOjPapXF/NWKNITguw4wah5pszDAw5TpQK8TUSXhK1LZJvI1zgAnfdARr7iFLB j0fbfV7gwbD5vs3QQ6ZFNj2hgoPj5l3V0t+HqMqwzeI5rR7xVoiRJ3p9a/wou7NxuOHa 5MMM1wOMn3gveCHvYgXWGB2tB5URlJx1kxJ12wPljJJls70HYZS6uBnumJJZwjcU+5HC v3mcBx1Kw2DawnRUH63L9GzYEfU/N/+yHf1K6ALJqPtBDtoTHkzmbUqfALE6/WmCE4R+ ys7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MoBJcwSj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i13si6241038edq.522.2021.03.20.04.56.59; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MoBJcwSj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230220AbhCTLyC (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:54:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34486 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230113AbhCTLxn (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:53:43 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF1C661953; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 09:52:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1616233948; bh=85GRKLkKiCsYPt5LA6jmas18wQB2oc9NU6q/HnEaJeQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MoBJcwSjz5ymWTpM4SXYwgHbr6hK6u/EsaKX/ZmPZDweR2wOSH7HFuLekjxWfQNF3 TyxTCOodlbwU4jhEyMEcrq4G/cId6R1YGC6DNn83YNXwsSjkJTqXB+5IgfIabdGXpA k+OLPzG4V2d8FuwjZ7Rad60iOElZL3D9WjvJqvgY= Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:52:25 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/8] 4.19.182-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210319121744.114946147@linuxfoundation.org> <20210319212146.GA23228@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210319212146.GA23228@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:21:46PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:18:19PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.182 release. > > There are 8 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 155 pass: 154 fail: 1 > Failed builds: > x86_64:tools/perf > Qemu test results: > total: 420 pass: 420 fail: 0 > > jvmti/jvmti_agent.c:48:21: error: static declaration of ‘gettid’ follows non-static declaration > 48 | static inline pid_t gettid(void) > | ^~~~~~ > In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:1170, > from jvmti/jvmti_agent.c:33: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/unistd_ext.h:34:16: note: previous declaration of ‘gettid’ was here > > The tools/perf error is not new. It is seen because I started updating > my servers to Ubuntu 20.0. The following patches would be needed to fix the > problem in v4.19.y. > > 8feb8efef97a tools build feature: Check if get_current_dir_name() is available > 11c6cbe706f2 tools build feature: Check if eventfd() is available > 4541a8bb13a8 tools build: Check if gettid() is available before providing helper > fc8c0a992233 perf tools: Use %define api.pure full instead of %pure-parser > > The first two patches prevent a conflict with the third patch, and the > last patch fixes an unrelated build warning. > > Older kernels are also affected. The list of patches needed for v4.14.y is: > > 0ada120c883d perf: Make perf able to build with latest libbfd > (this patch is in v4.9.y but not in v4.14.y) > 25ab5abf5b14 tools build feature: Check if pthread_barrier_t is available > 8feb8efef97a tools build feature: Check if get_current_dir_name() is available > 11c6cbe706f2 tools build feature: Check if eventfd() is available > 4541a8bb13a8 tools build: Check if gettid() is available before providing helper > fc8c0a992233 perf tools: Use %define api.pure full instead of %pure-parser > > I tried to fix the problem in v4.9.y and v4.4.y as well, but that is pretty > much hopeless. I'll have to stop testing perf builds for those kernels. I'll suck these in for the next round of releases, thanks. and thanks for testing. greg k-h