Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 21 Mar 2021 11:14:37 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@peak-system.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
Message-ID: <YFcOffNUTg8qxuNp@unreal>
References: <20210319082939.77495e55@canb.auug.org.au>
 <YFTJdL1yDId+iae4@unreal>
 <65e47dcc-702b-98e0-2750-d5b11a7c0ae1@pengutronix.de>
 <CAHk-=wgmL3qJhjnoG1z9kH-N0RokWOHATRjPyLWGx=U7Ar-1qA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgmL3qJhjnoG1z9kH-N0RokWOHATRjPyLWGx=U7Ar-1qA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:42:06PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:28 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Good idea. I'll send a pull request to David and Jakub.
> 
> I don't think the revert is necessary. The conflict is so trivial that
> it doesn't really matter.

<...>

> But something like this that just removes the
> MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE() thing that basically never gets touched
> anyway, and we happened to be unlucky in *one* file? Not a worry at
> all.

For me this specific revert is a way to reduce the overhead from the maintainer
when they prepare PRs. At least for me, PRs are most time consuming tasks.

No patch - no conflict - less worries.

Thanks