Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:34:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:34:33 -0500 Received: from h24-77-26-115.gv.shawcable.net ([24.77.26.115]:3087 "EHLO localhost") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:34:19 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ryan Cumming To: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:33:54 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011107183639.0285a7e0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.2.20011107193045.02b07f78@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <20011107132552.J5922@lynx.no> In-Reply-To: <20011107132552.J5922@lynx.no> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On November 7, 2001 12:25, Andreas Dilger wrote: > If both ext2 and ext3 are compiled into the kernel, then ext3 will try > first to mount the root fs. If there is no journal on this fs (check this > with tune2fs -l , and look for "has_journal" feature), then it will be > mounted as ext2. If you are doing strange things with initrd and modules, Is there any particular reason why the ext3 driver can't handle mounting both ext2 and ext3 filesystems? -Ryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/