Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751364AbWJFJ0g (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 05:26:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751353AbWJFJ0g (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 05:26:36 -0400 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]:52176 "EHLO mout2.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932134AbWJFJ0f convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 05:26:35 -0400 To: "Peter Osterlund" From: balagi@justmail.de Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 3/11] 2.6.18-mm3 pktcdvd: new pkt_find_dev() Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Priority: 3 X-Abuse: 300631278 / unknown, unknown User-Agent: freenetMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:26:33 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1102 Lines: 47 Hello, the idea was to simply allow map block-dev-id to pktcdvd and unmap block-dev-id from pktcdvd since this functionality can be implemented easily without costs in pkt_remove_dev() But it is ok to put it into user space. -Thomas Maier ----- original Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: [PATCH 3/11] 2.6.18-mm3 pktcdvd: new pkt_find_dev() Gesendet: Do 05 Okt 2006 21:51:43 CEST Von: "Peter Osterlund" > "Thomas Maier" writes: > > > Also pkt_remove_dev() can use now the device id of the mapped > > block device to remove the mapping. > > Why would that be desirable? I think it's better to implement this > feature in the user space tools and leave the kernel interface > simple. > > -- > Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com > http://web.telia.com/~u89404340 > --- original Nachricht Ende ---- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/