Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751450AbWJFKvu (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 06:51:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751455AbWJFKvu (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 06:51:50 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:55427 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751450AbWJFKvu (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 06:51:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: Please pull x86-64 bug fixes From: Alan Cox To: Andi Kleen Cc: Jeff Garzik , discuss@x86-64.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200610052344.18598.ak@suse.de> References: <200610051910.25418.ak@suse.de> <200610051953.23510.ak@suse.de> <1160085649.1607.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200610052344.18598.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:14:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1160133260.1607.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 23 Ar Iau, 2006-10-05 am 23:44 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen: > I think we had that argument before. IMHO such messages are completely > useless. Hangs are not acceptable no matter what messages are printed > before. Oh so you plan to fix the iommu/aacraid problem you always said you wouldn't fix ? > > That gets us the best of both worlds. > > Hanging systems? Working systems because the only hang case will be if you use hardware that requires the new goodies on a box that is *actually* broken rather than one which is misdetected by the paranoid check code. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/