Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3523632pxf; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywRplFf/vJFSAcfRoYuUJOCjWYHD/7qWxHbIxegiUSm20mcSCK99xLblzmSPnxmsuI1Kcx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4f02:: with SMTP id t2mr277036eju.121.1616426521194; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616426521; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mDa+lG++8DjEjVinqn4I6HXKyuBhyvpElXzmdSYihVREDgAomEInMX0BEBSefPpdti 3t5NdFI0jWUgdZuWS6KOeiBOVXTH0+jYsrK1l9iDtAVhXlzsakIaq8dOmQsVXcXdp8K+ nOHqpZRLaGw41uph4Ddfwlhv9uFurZUA93YKDY4+68BvjDWQumllkcoERsqy6Z4DyrHL 0TKWhMAFxO4yHJTH98Ew91xqJS+rN1uAqXqqYTJiass8hSFErCuSDylxayLaFmLofTW+ eF7lFHKORBEI87Zs9yCdJXEK+zueGvTP4orKjOs6pnFtlg7sgcGonY+zbSEhmSgfjFPe VGeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=xMbbezNB6w3Wu4iPYGeQcKo94V7ECOVdl2fFga/iLVM=; b=cPUKqmc/0QqV9BVs+8xwl4r0FPBM9fabgLn/bO4jJ+2dqwHi9nDMGfb91dofm5Jb9E GfCy/jV8WAUUmnxUf2b/GEVojEaNDcV/8a0xu0e5tvs5P1sr5DIB40hUFKFMwXSwFMdg +sX+/r3tR6F9zVwW4v13rV5Wh2l4NK68IbJIYKbMiY+LeQ1KctCkjp5rp7o7rAoMY+GS DVQ1dfQCK5lM5zc/hoZVynhfx/rbEFIiEwe0iYC6m8AlKUkitlwRB6Nb3p97Ra3Oeyz0 nJAUCHrtpYo9uB8CzQuFd2EVDYA1VP03AdVkg6Cd9Plaaj4nnNCjFtQo3jx1GX+yF8ue Ieaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si11481785eja.264.2021.03.22.08.21.38; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231666AbhCVPSi (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:18:38 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:56255 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231645AbhCVPS2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:18:28 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B542A68BFE; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:18:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:18:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , Jens Axboe , Geert Uytterhoeven , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Michael Ellerman , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] ARM: disable CONFIG_IDE in footbridge_defconfig Message-ID: <20210322151823.GA2764@lst.de> References: <20210318045706.200458-1-hch@lst.de> <20210318045706.200458-3-hch@lst.de> <20210319170753.GV1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210319175311.GW1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210322145403.GA30942@lst.de> <20210322151503.GX1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210322151503.GX1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:15:03PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > It gets worse than that though - due to a change to remove > pcibios_min_io from the generic code, moving it into the ARM > architecture code, this has caused a regression that prevents the > legacy resources being registered against the bus resource. So even > if they are there, they cause probe failures. I haven't found a > reasonable way to solve this yet, but until there is, there is no > way that the PATA driver can be used as the "legacy mode" support > is effectively done via the PCI code assigning virtual IO port > resources. > > I'm quite surprised that the CY82C693 even works on Alpha - I've > asked for a lspci for that last week but nothing has yet been > forthcoming from whoever responded to your patch for Alpha - so I > can't compare what I'm seeing with what's happening with Alpha. That sounds like something we could fix with a quirk for function 2 in the PCI resource assignment code. Can you show what vendor and device ID function 2 has so that I could try to come up with one?