Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3553307pxf; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf9nXN07JEw5gCl5UK+NTDrCqsFQYAcaCs4cWpoF6zTqU4N5AY/rX+Lan8BlEwe+OIyjn6 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dc4e:: with SMTP id g14mr310181edu.114.1616429086980; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:04:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616429086; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CL165+nHHLy8ajlvo7Z8KsWNG8yIRwIKPZVUxMdNTE+rMr8PQKJjiDe6JGEWYfZM/k ejfyUNDS2IxZqbePACVggHUeu1c0CJ5SDOMOHIQ4drspcisWacQBEvtFTyZytSucbTMr WBQOKNdJUnEkFgMOjjnHd3RmTOjCOOC877/Fr4jpaoIKK7Qmx3mIoR/COK+RaVEqGybm KTEC0Jt3QIoBSJXoT0unXAF+djSxX57Wy8SYpSIL9QUpq/kw36Qen7kwkl1CcEwJ3/yP LB3RucCoZcrhvF4srbn3IGLAHsIgmQ7ZT+QJ2plUHTo+VDOAfGJGd9J7zpW/NsOEwtXz TyQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=LqOpzQ5E3UoOxNTBZgEFRvoRZrE/JCGJXNffde/NB38=; b=fHVironyZKz8kP8zMFAQsWQ/drC/GANvR089TR8sOmEAiYX6LehX1LO1HVZXeeU/D4 TMRS0+RRpUMDiSs4qdAzK+bF0l6oq2qDNQGzNeAu6Kfy8tY3CMzZPALT2sb7TA6Q9YyH Z7m3gBtnxuhnIoMnaGFxY/1+RZh8DwuF7dTB9vk3JSz+lx70P/y6YAGyFTxefs3TgvgB vpLHSkvSwwqed6WY+5W5nvytbJtPt8wwcPv4q2uHbTxhtP+2eINs6j9lu7nn7Wvxpl+f XUr8qWLvFjssq+6lGaK25UHYYOfi4VUE13fQKTk2ZKcHLQpsOGNSQid1tPSq8G2kb9ih +s0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NR8zyZrm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k18si11231035eja.602.2021.03.22.09.04.24; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NR8zyZrm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231630AbhCVQDI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:03:08 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:43469 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231162AbhCVQCu (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:02:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616428970; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LqOpzQ5E3UoOxNTBZgEFRvoRZrE/JCGJXNffde/NB38=; b=NR8zyZrm38s3agy6c2shzUgRCNcO7e/i2ipVw1apn5wBfv5NXpbDze6Eoe4uhX3wYSJNDm 7TL2SWOGbA5HHw1/ut/czbFLwju8pXSTAPftL44yKDsQprPa2/w2FThscDEfV/cegHQoz0 RjATIGShs19T06vTTnGKV/1MApDneuE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-233-_gux_uh5O-SwGLTpjNedKQ-1; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:02:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _gux_uh5O-SwGLTpjNedKQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7303107B786; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (ovpn-115-54.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.54]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448B29CA0; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Daniel Vetter , Andy Shevchenko , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Dave Young , Baoquan He , Vivek Goyal , Dave Hansen , Keith Busch , Michal Hocko , Qian Cai , Oscar Salvador , Eric Biederman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tom Lendacky , Brijesh Singh , x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] kernel/resource: remove first_lvl / siblings_only logic Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:02:00 +0100 Message-Id: <20210322160200.19633-4-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210322160200.19633-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20210322160200.19633-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org All IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM and IORESOURCE_MEM now properly consider the whole resource tree, not just the first level. Let's drop the unused first_lvl / siblings_only logic. All functions properly search the whole tree, so remove documentation that indicates that some functions behave differently. Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Dave Young Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Vivek Goyal Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Keith Busch Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Eric Biederman Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Tom Lendacky Cc: Brijesh Singh Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- kernel/resource.c | 45 ++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c index 16e0c7e8ed24..7e00239a023a 100644 --- a/kernel/resource.c +++ b/kernel/resource.c @@ -64,12 +64,8 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(resource_lock); static struct resource *bootmem_resource_free; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bootmem_resource_lock); -static struct resource *next_resource(struct resource *p, bool sibling_only) +static struct resource *next_resource(struct resource *p) { - /* Caller wants to traverse through siblings only */ - if (sibling_only) - return p->sibling; - if (p->child) return p->child; while (!p->sibling && p->parent) @@ -81,7 +77,7 @@ static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) { struct resource *p = v; (*pos)++; - return (void *)next_resource(p, false); + return (void *)next_resource(p); } #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS @@ -330,14 +326,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource); * of the resource that's within [@start..@end]; if none is found, returns * -ENODEV. Returns -EINVAL for invalid parameters. * - * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children - * unless @first_lvl is true. - * * @start: start address of the resource searched for * @end: end address of same resource * @flags: flags which the resource must have * @desc: descriptor the resource must have - * @first_lvl: walk only the first level children, if set * @res: return ptr, if resource found * * The caller must specify @start, @end, @flags, and @desc @@ -345,9 +337,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource); */ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc, - bool first_lvl, struct resource *res) + struct resource *res) { - bool siblings_only = true; struct resource *p; if (!res) @@ -358,7 +349,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, read_lock(&resource_lock); - for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p, siblings_only)) { + for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p)) { /* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */ if (p->start > end) { p = NULL; @@ -369,13 +360,6 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, if (p->end < start) continue; - /* - * Now that we found a range that matches what we look for, - * check the flags and the descriptor. If we were not asked to - * use only the first level, start looking at children as well. - */ - siblings_only = first_lvl; - if ((p->flags & flags) != flags) continue; if ((desc != IORES_DESC_NONE) && (desc != p->desc)) @@ -402,14 +386,14 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc, - bool first_lvl, void *arg, + void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) { struct resource res; int ret = -EINVAL; while (start < end && - !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, first_lvl, &res)) { + !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) { ret = (*func)(&res, arg); if (ret) break; @@ -431,7 +415,6 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, * @arg: function argument for the callback @func * @func: callback function that is called for each qualifying resource area * - * This walks through whole tree and not just first level children. * All the memory ranges which overlap start,end and also match flags and * desc are valid candidates. * @@ -441,7 +424,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) { - return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, false, arg, func); + return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, arg, func); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc); @@ -457,8 +440,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, { unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; - return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, false, - arg, func); + return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg, + func); } /* @@ -470,17 +453,14 @@ int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, { unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; - return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, false, - arg, func); + return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg, + func); } /* * This function calls the @func callback against all memory ranges of type * System RAM which are marked as IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM and IORESOUCE_BUSY. * It is to be used only for System RAM. - * - * This will find System RAM ranges that are children of top-level resources - * in addition to top-level System RAM resources. */ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg, int (*func)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *)) @@ -495,8 +475,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; while (start < end && - !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, - false, &res)) { + !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, &res)) { pfn = PFN_UP(res.start); end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(res.end + 1); if (end_pfn > pfn) -- 2.29.2