Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422692AbWJFOeL (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:34:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422669AbWJFOeK (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:34:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:27599 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422692AbWJFOeI (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:34:08 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20061006141704.GH2563@parisc-linux.org> References: <20061006141704.GH2563@parisc-linux.org> <20061006133414.9972.79007.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] LOG2: Implement a general integer log2 facility in the kernel [try #4] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:33:44 +0100 Message-ID: <10081.1160145224@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 635 Lines: 20 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Why not "def_bool n"? def_bool? What's that? default + bool? I don't remember seeing any of those in any of the files I looked in. > Or indeed, since the default is n, why not just "bool"? *shrug* I'd prefer to default all of these in a common place rather than having to relentlessly duplicate them over all archs. Is that possible? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/