Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281177AbRKHA1e>; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:27:34 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281181AbRKHA1Y>; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:27:24 -0500
Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.94]:23824 "EHLO
	probity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S281177AbRKHA1K>; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:27:10 -0500
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 00:27:06 +0000
From: John Levon <moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.
Message-ID: <20011108002705.A45912@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <F218Wqr2f9hYDkngMUJ00002181@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F218Wqr2f9hYDkngMUJ00002181@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
X-Url: http://www.movement.uklinux.net/
X-Record: Truant - Neither Work Nor Leisure
X-Toppers: N/A
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:41:26PM -0500, William Knop wrote:

> You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of 
> organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part 
> of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is 
> messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat.

Like cleaning your room, talking endlessly about how doesn't get you anywhere.
Show some code ...

john

-- 
"This bulletin discusses three security vulnerabilities that are unrelated
except in the sense that both affect ISA Server 2000"
	- Microsoft Product Security
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/