Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3622499pxf; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIUTtYwKtRMtoXRZmFiM1YKmfHLzHMrCrlow6i3H3e7sVsM/7X1G9Sr/ozCbVgciyTsRhV X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9611:: with SMTP id gb17mr946534ejc.325.1616434980035; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616434980; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iblGivFjsXNm9cysLsKe/Kc6FdLC7K1FCXeM8tuupP7tSnoWhAB74V5ZXdBk4+oWXN u/6BaBPn0C+NfuG3a6y8Pq+2nEyJVIvZenfA1xMw1DVnI3Frfku+vgc8D8BBGgRlvNEj hsdrhkPbtpuwy043UMsLOU6ma/pCY0ZlGlrXwMqiW1obR44n4iKgZBm0TzVjrw+Mrad6 tGK7oAAGpklloJWVXa+PwbLT/HKPK+oEhydIknnqXs+wKyGFG5NxBjc5mdepp3UloELw tJ+UIF0QxiQVfd3Bd26YsGlbS0k4dO7apD/g7CH0yq6CY9gY/MTFqEvdSG4HZsCac7Ex yAjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=+fO8q0q5J+d7OtGdbjb3cUlxaHCNevc3CNJXbnhrioc=; b=lYTATjR0C4rgyq/Cndi6UhIvL23JRA3Qnz0lhX/5Ded7jCfwMT9vgBRUFiYJDiiBbB +gsGbGUw8YC5418d7GoFMgtW6uXX2cssN89dYLzp8FbW2UmgVj7xcAQvpQq3IL5j9/My q84oLCLgfsAgjvettcAZ/2csyo5T2KnuKW0uiFECEgfmvDKTtagGDog4pQqOBFuFV2Lo ngnk2/nd7tEh+GsGclGrGEeb9NczPXiR2b4kVf+eRrL5uMhb+YdV1JX1A4AljtzTHTs/ HMFc9CAc0Lp1XJ4rwZn1A9seifpl2I079kuhxWhawFNIBgvazPHLWxB3o7jPlgpGcihX BaBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=iqx4aHW7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bo5si11217044edb.459.2021.03.22.10.42.37; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=iqx4aHW7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232137AbhCVRlR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:41:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34490 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231750AbhCVRkq (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:40:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF9FC061574 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id k8so18037478wrc.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:40:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+fO8q0q5J+d7OtGdbjb3cUlxaHCNevc3CNJXbnhrioc=; b=iqx4aHW7FNF4wyHYPNIxseKctlq/hpv2wK6Dm4zP9Tm/R4vtJuDBdYLnpsXx7vRvl5 29DRkgQ0flZpLqhEWVQF+YDhsqwjyVHk9Kvze/AiJZjbPlu7s/j/P21LjcE8WT6+FCA/ T6MzgN0XxviMCYwiIIlm3Xms3t6SW+FWzrAAz6WmTD9+buffDPXNPy3XgjT/T/6LNnww dz4ze9nLU2jgndXpnCn+7uJTD7KOzUP1Qg+DZxaOCa1GkylEgeUItff0Oip8TwrR6hix VKsxwdpQila6uZCigkSXOny68RWCrG0mlOb9U8kdycED+PLzsttKS1heAJ78rtygNuDT gOAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+fO8q0q5J+d7OtGdbjb3cUlxaHCNevc3CNJXbnhrioc=; b=sl0L9ti4l8a3g/ZhyY9UT7WvXFM2U88wsacCsQqJteHYJzLQ55jG1HjJUr209Xzm7c TAKXjvngVyNStasAnGEHPlr2mzXTQPgtcMEPi9FHdRd4rvbq3dyb0UdHYc2YoD9bcDZh /FIu6u6UTnc0tRAlfPFGyz97p0ZRTKmiMnfOdiQ6i8yqVBDN5ilaKMq8PAM9JLbeZ17y ltSo3yeiiuhrAVoX7sEiQFvNQoMvym9vKZsnybXiXNe2T16kVEVtkOgOfekNWzbC2UgG u4NHa8Fmr+Iy9NroVeuRUSz/oMFh55+uXFk2XWg0TyEViUF5BsOZysff0aipm6KlvlQp MYew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tcC8wxi21+AGS8JnZPoC6d96cwv3mPA4UYpxZPXzrzq6e9kYF 0PpdQQghPdSahCYp2qE4Kad2Iw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f0c1:: with SMTP id x1mr656464wro.7.1616434843381; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (230.69.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.69.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b131sm105865wmb.34.2021.03.22.10.40.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:40:40 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Marc Zyngier Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, android-kvm@google.com, seanjc@google.com, mate.toth-pal@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, tabba@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Generate final CTR_EL0 value when running in Protected mode Message-ID: References: <20210322164828.800662-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210322164828.800662-3-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210322164828.800662-3-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey Marc, On Monday 22 Mar 2021 at 16:48:27 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote: > In protected mode, late CPUs are not allowed to boot (enforced by > the PSCI relay). We can thus specialise the read_ctr macro to > always return a pre-computed, sanitised value. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 9 +++++++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 1 + > arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > index fb651c1f26e9..1a4cee7eb3c9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > @@ -270,12 +270,21 @@ alternative_endif > * provide the system wide safe value from arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0.sys_val > */ > .macro read_ctr, reg > +#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ > alternative_if_not ARM64_MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE > mrs \reg, ctr_el0 // read CTR > nop > alternative_else > ldr_l \reg, arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 + ARM64_FTR_SYSVAL > alternative_endif > +#else > +alternative_cb kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0 > + movz \reg, #0 > + movk \reg, #0, lsl #16 > + movk \reg, #0, lsl #32 > + movk \reg, #0, lsl #48 > +alternative_cb_end > +#endif > .endm So, FWIW, if we wanted to make _this_ macro BUG in non-protected mode (and drop patch 01), I think we could do something like: alternative_cb kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0 movz \reg, #0 ASM_BUG() nop nop alternative_cb_end and then make kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0() check that we're in protected mode before patching. That would be marginally better as that would cover _all_ users of read_ctr and not just __flush_dcache_area, but that first movz is a bit yuck (but necessary to keep generate_mov_q() happy I think?), so I'll leave the decision to you. No objection from me for the current implementation, and if you decide to go with it: Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret Thanks, Quentin