Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: cang=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:22:28 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
Cc:     daejun7.park@samsung.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        avri.altman@wdc.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
        stanley.chu@mediatek.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        JinHwan Park <jh.i.park@samsung.com>,
        Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@samsung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
        Dukhyun Kwon <d_hyun.kwon@samsung.com>,
        Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>,
        Jaemyung Lee <jaemyung.lee@samsung.com>,
        Jieon Seol <jieon.seol@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v31 2/4] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read
In-Reply-To: <75df140d2167eadf1089d014f571d711a9aeb6a5.camel@gmail.com>
References: <20210322065127epcms2p5021a61416a6b427c62fcaf5d8b660860@epcms2p5>
 <CGME20210322065127epcms2p5021a61416a6b427c62fcaf5d8b660860@epcms2p4>
 <20210322065410epcms2p431f73262f508e9e3e16bd4995db56a4b@epcms2p4>
 <75df140d2167eadf1089d014f571d711a9aeb6a5.camel@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d6a032261a642a4afed80188ea4772ee@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-03-22 17:11, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 15:54 +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
>> +       switch (rsp_field->hpb_op) {
>> 
>> +       case HPB_RSP_REQ_REGION_UPDATE:
>> 
>> +               if (data_seg_len != DEV_DATA_SEG_LEN)
>> 
>> +                       dev_warn(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
>> 
>> +                                "%s: data seg length is not
>> same.\n",
>> 
>> +                                __func__);
>> 
>> +               ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(hpb, rsp_field);
>> 
>> +               break;
>> 
>> +       case HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET:
>> 
>> +               dev_warn(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
>> 
>> +                        "UFS device lost HPB information during
>> PM.\n");
>> 
>> +               break;
> 
> Hi Deajun,
> This series looks good to me. Just here I have one question. You didn't
> handle HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET, just a warning.  Based on your SS UFS, how to
> handle HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET from the host side? Do you think we shoud
> reset host side HPB entry as well or what else?
> 
> 
> Bean

Same question here - I am still collecting feedbacks from flash vendors 
about
what is recommanded host behavior on reception of HPB Op code 0x2, since 
it
is not cleared defined in HPB2.0 specs.

Can Guo.