Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4034557pxf; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:22:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjJt3UczCzSERYJS8qWRThooIHVetZYi3DlK5RBWINUiM2ulvLxgqHWqfoEdkSSPnk6z8V X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cf95:: with SMTP id z21mr3189773edx.76.1616484156091; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:22:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616484156; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p2LzzdpCixbxypB/bBvPTlP4DUyCuAClgt+N/EitjZe6hIZkCYe0KdHHukfeX1a0yl Ct0If0KF0FCWLFx3l3RiRcuYIyNFyA5r7vF7hF9nu9+19cduoJO/Apmu0neloxpcdt5f 4reHtotAOVGnGIzyZwMSBOuPdI1V00aXxLSOUs8XdNb7UJUH2H/ElWHJrOLmdBwT1x0a 5ZUNu6MzOJmTD1NlM6Yzj/Bn1P4iKyDSp+D3+/kzQ0No0PCsU1vOSCNGmk8Hhzv+z4rj shCJ81tXYr8/b/QmiXzlI6PvXASYXJbbrPxRfZMm7tQRh+8/me0z2Ck9KUZf4CKNjJMe zNjA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=+06lCpqdOfejaxVMqAmaOiuZmidiGCUNKfmOlMN9K0g=; b=uXrZXb9XpE6odGmDlTHHpijDWrtRuswuIZE3ANaaun6AckZinEA6fWPA/PmjmViGOK NTPJlHLpR0jrhjmUULgcZk0b/T3O2850XRytZ9x7Bc5K+z4sD2cdcZeax9fXOAGVvsGO 87dXJKYenWCOktqA9Y28u+/SB5nsJv0LIukR+1qb46R8uCa1pITPQqc3BjlahK6BOoPy ZnAe6UpzpQiFB6XtZ/H7zkr06gmltti+Y1a0Fes2N2W/q6qPWA2tkEPrU1g/ARis3iVF WI8nAjrjPjRaj0y/ATaNcdRxFh7gWPxwkzwLeFOtFuBXs1YeIyIYN2bv9RluhXVV2/uM DHyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2020-01-29 header.b=Uubky1p5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v18si12624243ejc.691.2021.03.23.00.22.12; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2020-01-29 header.b=Uubky1p5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229494AbhCWHVC (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:21:02 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:52290 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230133AbhCWHU7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:20:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 12N78pon163839; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:20:06 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=+06lCpqdOfejaxVMqAmaOiuZmidiGCUNKfmOlMN9K0g=; b=Uubky1p5Wze59pYeTEnRAJ3kw9aF3wdUmLpdMGbC6VgDgekneuUsd1jS7ERkOT+yOSu7 99DrgZ8ecjIeyfB7cJXr1IZb7Mv1xk/pLuNGEHLfr87kMBlPrqIufyhBKGM6mRQzu3od pnRQ2SHAr9Hm5SAe0zyuIeijHF2/UDwo1avxdUuShTLprv5RrunD899VdhrvZezH3cyW kYNEqPI6WQFi6F5cUbI7ILUYvIBdBr6nuTEZzYXCIPWWRyZwgIVvQ92BrvKjVzdyrUIZ StgZiaox2kngGArg5gdQWuyxLMozlDWtLQMpNIwX72giLmFQmCrmkuKAqcsVSkreVFrl zg== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 37d8fr5vcm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:20:06 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 12N7EfYk014961; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:20:05 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 37dtyx2nqa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:20:04 +0000 Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 12N7JvvK022969; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:19:57 GMT Received: from kadam (/102.36.221.92) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:19:56 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:19:45 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Namjae Jeon Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifsd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, smfrench@gmail.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org, hyc.lee@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, hch@infradead.org, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, aurelien.aptel@gmail.com, aaptel@suse.com, sandeen@sandeen.net, colin.king@canonical.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, "'Sergey Senozhatsky'" , "'Steve French'" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3 Message-ID: <20210323071945.GJ1667@kadam> References: <20210322051344.1706-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20210322051344.1706-3-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20210322064712.GD1667@kadam> <009b01d71f71$9224f4e0$b66edea0$@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009b01d71f71$9224f4e0$b66edea0$@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-IMR: 1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9931 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103230050 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9931 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103230049 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:17:47AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > > > + > > > +static int > > > +compare_oid(unsigned long *oid1, unsigned int oid1len, > > > + unsigned long *oid2, unsigned int oid2len) { > > > + unsigned int i; > > > + > > > + if (oid1len != oid2len) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < oid1len; i++) { > > > + if (oid1[i] != oid2[i]) > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + return 1; > > > +} > > > > Call this oid_eq()? > Why not compare_oid()? This code is come from cifs. > I need clear reason to change both cifs/cifsd... > Boolean functions should tell you what they are testing in the name. Without any context you can't know what if (compare_oid(one, two)) { means, but if (oid_equal(one, two)) { is readable. regards, dan carpenter