Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:07:01 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, wsa@kernel.org,
        jasowang@redhat.com, wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com,
        arnd@arndb.de, kblaiech@mellanox.com,
        jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru,
        rppt@kernel.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org, tali.perry1@gmail.com,
        u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        yu1.wang@intel.com, shuo.a.liu@intel.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
Message-ID: <20210323083701.aqc2qmktoaunnp4b@vireshk-i7>
References: <226a8d5663b7bb6f5d06ede7701eedb18d1bafa1.1616493817.git.jie.deng@intel.com>
 <20210323072704.rgoelmq62fl2wjjf@vireshk-i7>
 <a2994a8f-bbf9-b26f-a9d2-eb02df6623b8@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a2994a8f-bbf9-b26f-a9d2-eb02df6623b8@intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 23-03-21, 16:33, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2021/3/23 15:27, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > On 23-03-21, 22:19, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > +static int __maybe_unused virtio_i2c_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	virtio_i2c_del_vqs(vdev);
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __maybe_unused virtio_i2c_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	return virtio_i2c_setup_vqs(vdev->priv);
> > > +}
> > Sorry for not looking at this earlier, but shouldn't we enclose the above two
> > within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead and drop the __maybe_unused ?
> 
> 
> I remembered I was suggested to use "__maybe_unused" instead of "#ifdef".
> 
> You may check this https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732981/
> 
> The reason may be something like that.

Ahh, thanks for the link Jie. Okay you can leave it as is.

-- 
viresh