Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4104204pxf; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:48:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx34G1S+f+W+br/XDGvfbrtA51w8EvIWTer2j9gBMLAiZRg22xUfbGg08hcC34hO0KC79gm X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4d85:: with SMTP id s5mr4052629eju.43.1616492933832; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:48:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616492933; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h6H9GthuGUMyna8OTDgZGrJPE55vy/I+kPxINLoByrdN/6oUqWq1Uk2l+pvC1kRCsv 1f6uB6oLKvK52RY+s/iryuGDr2MYTiUofd9by0FLUkLLwHOFjTe7ML2Q2W7ET2NFP03V PmhNEwUzxEUGcg+Q98bu//uwzBBVDJMSOfUTk8c7LWPHBU4/BJPaNyRFjxOsYBRBhIt+ SoIspWQtUwv3/QMKGiLtpEb95rxM8AmHuVv8/JO7PmQdM773Obb7oYA8HEjPZa+wqDLF gTgVB6E+TumU106uE5osfvAl5KZoT7f++T0/uxTKKjMauOrnLsVu2ayRdEor5m9Ui74m +zPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=oEiL3agt/74r7enmoTbEE0QlFnF8CJn1Y4avzKhgTiU=; b=Akleg0BhF1eSie8jK99UN6JEuWJ7BPSjlcKHBZX+gAuPFdGDAp1Tobc2acVG51KpLB JNKohGKDJWpsVIIcV8Ju0HPp+b9/U8+v+0K0bdeHls2a8u+oOAFXHVK+npTPPGpuLMEz q4chqCPVHOXeO4HDOB/3q3VQ0elrgMHVVH17NuUC3swoeZ39U8lfDiTYpv7B91TuGhM+ QRRsiL4kY8cjfvzdIJ9VNsVBwTrkhTzBohTBXwmFpEzAMCOmifnWRrzA6wHkZTGd3gGH SEj/srxhUvdMPbMqIpo+cl4v2hgXuMMw54f884VCYtNznPFsTT29g4i88rgNaLrhVwLk 4zzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="YUFx/qgD"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9si13402767ejx.635.2021.03.23.02.48.31; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="YUFx/qgD"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230203AbhCWJr1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:47:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44092 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230156AbhCWJrO (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:47:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D97C061574 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id z2so20066452wrl.5 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:47:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oEiL3agt/74r7enmoTbEE0QlFnF8CJn1Y4avzKhgTiU=; b=YUFx/qgDiqyZgnG8fBQV5CEOQ9+BCRiJTNLw0U/Sjtwv7xDzYaCvOnt/DijlqjJDeq 4gQ1ijgTeZbWSdb+trVyRWjQKbmgFIyw4kGzPHLfck/FJdRXsv6bJpcjqeUqY7ghYvwq pRcEi12K2xC6zj3zsdQHR7GQAz649sWNk0M5X3vcihlgBrPbW/ysFTU3zhgqPGfOiyln Ce/J3a+l+5yKFk7jm7otSR8CvCnQGsnVqlJVGNBKTlVXojSRlpjhpm+gC9AtYVeX6D4+ uJijgatuuL+mfS0/3DkfrCgbc1Hn0xyCXdplBpsN8aHekogkBv5nmPi8VJ893Vsd2gbg iDTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oEiL3agt/74r7enmoTbEE0QlFnF8CJn1Y4avzKhgTiU=; b=fqFWU0ySJF0Ohz0CR2wnGG3SqLIfWlucKyDHPov6J2QWdi7IRbS07mKWOEfSX/PbzO rInbnmfr8nO2973uHsh357muNYVND/E8oSyOy/bUjruSbXAgnNLVCkmE5GTweSTtoPvP P2YPa7nREzKpv6aUYmnY0OjYo2qnUR9g+S+0QpjoMdzLPQ/Kj4iRl68zqD0enAbxsDPA UK3C2aoyUW1EDkNclWMPFTVDQh3gM4pm3GinO5QCE2UHgK92N/iIn9SBFB/scI2rj8+P yzng54C8psiOh8KKVxOXoBDyJ5RO4r6FpUcnc9dJO3IgEg59YGGXhAphB76unST7yoYt LTnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HvWDywPDN4kY26621T4XWL6rkGtSoPnimZCvj/xd97ay1kD59 6N9pnX2eVzfBcup5MCx1ecJFWA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee4f:: with SMTP id w15mr3039063wro.199.1616492831791; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (230.69.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.69.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm29442912wrd.9.2021.03.23.02.47.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:47:08 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Marc Zyngier Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, android-kvm@google.com, seanjc@google.com, mate.toth-pal@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, tabba@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Generate final CTR_EL0 value when running in Protected mode Message-ID: References: <20210322164828.800662-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210322164828.800662-3-maz@kernel.org> <87k0pzghlx.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k0pzghlx.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On Monday 22 Mar 2021 at 18:37:14 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote: > Can't say I'm keen on the yucky bit, but here's an alternative (ha!) > for you: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > index 1a4cee7eb3c9..7582c3bd2f05 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > @@ -278,6 +278,9 @@ alternative_else > ldr_l \reg, arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 + ARM64_FTR_SYSVAL > alternative_endif > #else > +alternative_if_not ARM64_KVM_PROTECTED_MODE > + ASM_BUG() > +alternative_else_nop_endif > alternative_cb kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0 > movz \reg, #0 > movk \reg, #0, lsl #16 > > Yes, it is one more instruction, but it is cleaner and allows us to > from the first patch of the series. > > What do you think? Yes, I think having the ASM_BUG() in this macro is bit nicer and I doubt the additional nop will make any difference, so this is looking good to me! Thanks, Quentin