Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <7ef41d771af88f84b650ff83771cd59eb745634f.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/imx: fix out of bounds array access warning
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:19:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20210323130550.2289487-1-arnd@kernel.org>
References: <20210323130550.2289487-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 14:05 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> When CONFIG_OF is disabled, building with 'make W=1' produces warnings
> about out of bounds array access:
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c: In function 'imx_ldb_set_clock.constprop':
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c:186:8: error: array subscript -22 is below array bounds of 'struct clk *[4]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 
> Add an error check before the index is used, which helps with the
> warning, as well as any possible other error condition that may be
> triggered at runtime.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c
[]
> @@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ static void imx_ldb_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> ?	int dual = ldb->ldb_ctrl & LDB_SPLIT_MODE_EN;
> ?	int mux = drm_of_encoder_active_port_id(imx_ldb_ch->child, encoder);
> 
> +	if (mux < 0) {
> +		dev_warn(ldb->dev,
> +			 "%s: invalid mux\n", __func__);

trivia:

Any real reason to make this 2 lines?  It fits nicely in 80 chars.  Maybe:

		dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux: %d\n", __func__, mux);

or maybe:

		dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux: %pe\n",
			 __func__, ERR_PTR(mux));

> @@ -255,6 +261,12 @@ imx_ldb_encoder_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
[]
> +	if (mux < 0) {
> +		dev_warn(ldb->dev,
> +			 "%s: invalid mux\n", __func__);

etc...