Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932654AbWJFWnD (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:43:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932656AbWJFWnC (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:43:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:16769 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932654AbWJFWnA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:43:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:42:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Vadim Lobanov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fdtable: Extensive fs/file.c cleanups. Message-Id: <20061006154254.e9d584d0.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200610061438.07702.vlobanov@speakeasy.net> References: <200610052152.29013.vlobanov@speakeasy.net> <20061006132258.39fc58ed.akpm@osdl.org> <200610061438.07702.vlobanov@speakeasy.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1783 Lines: 46 On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:38:07 -0700 Vadim Lobanov wrote: > On Friday 06 October 2006 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:52:28 -0700 > > > > Vadim Lobanov wrote: > > > As long as the previous patch replaces the guts of fs/file.c, it makes > > > sense to tidy up all the code within. This work includes: > > > code simplification via refactoring, > > > elimination of unnecessary code paths, > > > extensive commenting throughout the entire file, and > > > other minor cleanups and consistency tweaks. > > > This patch does not contain any functional modifications. > > > > > > This is the last patch in the series. All the code should now be sparkly > > > clean. > > > > This (wordwrapped) patch should have been the first in the series, not the > > last. > > Didn't know. Was hoping to gather this kind of feedback after the first > submission attempt. > > > So I'll drop this one. > > This patch still has a lot of useful (and I'd argue necessary) fixes for > incorrect comments and confusing code ordering. It's especially nice for > those who might try to understand what's going on inside fs/file.c, so seems > a shame to drop it. I could... > ... hold on to it until the other fdtable changes hit mainline. > or > ... redo this one with just the bare essentials. > or > ... drop it completely. or ... redo the patches so this one comes first. Which sounds like a hassle. If it's too much hassle, your option 1 sounds OK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/