Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:30:20 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        conghui.chen@intel.com, kblaiech@mellanox.com,
        jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
        Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>,
        Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        yu1.wang@intel.com, shuo.a.liu@intel.com,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
Message-ID: <20210324040020.xazfou6wgvvh74gs@vireshk-i7>
References: <226a8d5663b7bb6f5d06ede7701eedb18d1bafa1.1616493817.git.jie.deng@intel.com>
 <20210323072704.rgoelmq62fl2wjjf@vireshk-i7>
 <a2994a8f-bbf9-b26f-a9d2-eb02df6623b8@intel.com>
 <CAK8P3a3OBUZC2nxaQ2wyL9EeT3gzXUX9sfJ+ZJfJUiJK_3ZkrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3a671a0a-b0d0-be1a-5463-8124ff63684d@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3a671a0a-b0d0-be1a-5463-8124ff63684d@intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 24-03-21, 09:17, Jie Deng wrote:
> I didn't see the "struct virtio_driver" has a member "struct dev_pm_ops *pm"
> 
> It defines its own hooks (freeze and restore) though it includes "struct
> device_driver"
> 
> which has a "struct dev_pm_ops *pm".
> 
> I just follow other virtio drivers to directly use the hooks defined in
> "struct virtio_driver".

Right, I think we can't use the SIMPLE PM OPS for virtio yet, the core calls
only the freeze and restore callbacks which are part of struct virtio_driver.

> For this driver, Both __maybe_unused and #ifdef are OK to me.

Yes, and so you should use only #ifdef here as Arnd confirmed. You shouldn't be
using __maybe_unused as there is nothing confusing here related to the macros.

-- 
viresh