Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:e90b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gt11csp801406pxb; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:50:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziQbNKXiCBHH0q8f3v6JhqJwQw8ae4hdncgRJblZHrAsH98FkVUT5jj8jRu8wAO62qrCRB X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:27d3:: with SMTP id c19mr6529495ede.129.1616637022109; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:50:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616637022; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gLmktA11btZUNv7YPpl+9vn9BMk4FiziNFsBD/GjsboxypDL9VPvHRwAxzv8aroGWD ABg5pj/T3OoPcD8Pd7GIdJyk8pDlvAC7c4dDqck567krGQ/f0TIFXK+CSRrsSvm6m6gU d7+Q88yH8DGmhT/b3MDLlM09Iu37yrDiwt6BFbMVr0RTQqn6jLotpBLYy7bZ7M8TAeZ7 DUe9AoorcLrmXS1XCpyos83hned46rl0DCXnH3Xw7IDCBCZ027yZfRp01TOqhEafXFbZ bF04EgH0OlVd+AOlbjcLcmBVFktXEkjLU4Tvv7ytFmCU33Mf1CTRO/M6LVvRsKw7oHxv bc1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:ironport-sdr :ironport-sdr; bh=DVaDMrD2kVmn0w85+dyDP0yDl3SHlye4jTE2tMdV6rM=; b=ad1Y2rbjElEQX53rIIgaKE7SiY2qCwR8wPZaoL4WlHyx6HSIWD8LUk8ZQ1qFkDvpcg T9HPAJmZjwLL6XSJyITmjfScoboFavg9AEoieRLx+axn0baaTt7q7fliay872Ub6/PPg kTdsdqd/zfz4ckf+lDsAHHCjtPInh68RRBzR2F8fjvScT8m42+Km6FQ8yxI2defVnsXo M4GH4jhaw4WygZQXXeiPtK0Ea7r8vsjEtWka8WbD7NamZ5leICawKkWD0c7lXf2Dmn8u FoFSIX05T3nHmbZNvRP9qZhPujpTVKeAL+pmH2nhru+HAShVIG0Y0UBE0QjqRVD4VTpy ucvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt20si3236681edb.201.2021.03.24.18.49.57; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233469AbhCXI1S (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:27:18 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:32112 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233491AbhCXI0z (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:26:55 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 0Lfbh1CppgWknsTN2/We3F0kEzfccb+wkOBEpAGQa+ZR9AlFyVUKzM1wmr7dKvnc4LuxgS+zB8 /3G282cJOdEw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9932"; a="210758659" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,274,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="210758659" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2021 01:26:55 -0700 IronPort-SDR: uWZsj1jx5IrDe3h4aTHfSUqVc1vj4lfTyMAQlqUBdOC5rbUbgCvIGzicgDNqxXI3v4k62VeKcd kK3HThWswSfw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,274,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="408734817" Received: from yilunxu-optiplex-7050.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.141]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2021 01:26:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:22:17 +0800 From: Xu Yilun To: mdf@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: trix@redhat.com, lgoncalv@redhat.com, hao.wu@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] UIO support for dfl devices Message-ID: <20210324082217.GA405791@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> References: <1615168776-8553-1-git-send-email-yilun.xu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1615168776-8553-1-git-send-email-yilun.xu@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Moritz: Sorry I need to get back to you again, seems no more comments from Greg. The patchset is stuck here for more than 1 month. Do you have some more suggestion that could make it move forward? Do you have some more comments? Or give an acked-by? Or could you apply it to your fpga branch and go with next pull request? Thanks, Yilun On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:59:34AM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote: > This patchset supports some dfl device drivers written in userspace. > > There are some Q&A about why UIO driver is needed in v11: > > >From Greg: > Why are you saying that an ethernet driver should be using the UIO > interface? > > And why can't you use the existing UIO drivers that bind to memory > regions specified by firmware? Without an interrupt being used, why is > UIO needed at all? > > >From Moritz: > Essentially I see two options: > - Have a DFL bus driver instantiate a platform driver (uio_pdrv_genirq) > which I *think* you described above? > - What this patch implements -- a UIO driver on the DFL bus > > These FPGA devices can on the fly change their contents and -- even if > just for test -- being able to expose a bunch of registers via UIO can > be extremely useful. > > Whether a device should expose registers or not should be up to the > implemeneter of the FPGA design I think (policy). This patch (or the > previous version) provides a mechanism to do so via DFL. > > This is similar in nature to uio_pdrv_genirq on a DT based platform, to > expose the registers you instantiate the DT node. > > Re-implementing a new driver for each of these instances doesn't seem > desirable and tying DFL as enumeration mechanism to UIO seems like a > good compromise for enabling this kind of functionality. > > Note this is *not* an attempt to bypass the network stack or other > existing subsystems. > > See the original message in: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/YDvQ8aO8v3NhLKzx@epycbox.lan/T/#m66ba2c96848e3dea38d1a4f16dfea3cb291f7975 > > > >From Yilun: > The ETH GROUP IP is not designed as the full functional ethernet > controller. It is specially developed for the Intel N3000 NIC. Since it > is an FPGA based card, it is designed for the users to runtime reload > part of the MAC layer logic developed by themselves, while the ETH GROUP > is another part of the MAC which is not expected to be reloaded by > customers, but it provides some configurations for software to work with > the user logic. > > So I category the feature as the devices that "designed for specific > purposes and does not fit into one of the standard kernel subsystems". > Some related description could be found in Patch #2, to illustrate why > using UIO for some DFL devices. > > There are now UIO drivers for PCI or platform devices, but in this case > we are going to export a DFL(Device Feature List) bus device to > userspace, a DFL driver for UIO is needed to bind to it. > > See the original message in: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/YDvQ8aO8v3NhLKzx@epycbox.lan/T/#m91b303fd61485644353fad1e1e9c11d528844684 > > > Xu Yilun (2): > uio: uio_dfl: add userspace i/o driver for DFL bus > Documentation: fpga: dfl: Add description for DFL UIO support > > Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst | 26 ++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > drivers/uio/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++++++ > drivers/uio/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 111 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c > > -- > 2.7.4