Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210228124106.135812-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
 <20210228124106.135812-2-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org> <20210322161810.biagj2qro66rv4gt@maple.lan>
 <20210323083935.GF2916463@dell>
In-Reply-To: <20210323083935.GF2916463@dell>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:54:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUamD4rAY1Sn-3Fb9Xf1B9g0FY0Pob8rAFsFR0ZcNZ0rw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] video: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8994 compatible
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
        martin.botka@somainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@somainline.org, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-leds <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Lee,

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>
> Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?

Only 12 days later?!?

It's not uncommon to receive acks for patches after they have been
applied upstream. But it is if the patch was applied 10 years and 9
months ago!
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/F5513AE92A5A1047AC2F91AEBB9202680288CBBA3983@E2K7-MS2.ds.strath.ac.uk/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds