Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:25:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:25:17 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:27121 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:24:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:24:42 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Memory accounting problem in 2.4.13, 2.4.14pre, and possibly 2.4.14 Message-ID: <20011107182442.B467@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011106140335.A13678@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <3BE9E9A7.6F90C4DB@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BE9E9A7.6F90C4DB@zip.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 06:10:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to track down a memory accounting problem I've seen ever since I > > tried a 2.4.13 based kernel. Specifically I've noticed an overflow for the > > "Cached" entry in /proc/meminfo, but also the numbers don't add up to the > > total memory count. Shouldn't they add up? If they should, I haven't seen > > one that does.... > > > > I first noticed it on: > > 2.4.13freeswan-1.91+ac5+preempt+netdev_random+vm_freeswap > > 2.4.14-pre6+preempt+netdev_random+ext3_0.9.14-2414p5 > > > > I thought it may be preempt so I tried: > > 2.4.14-pre8+netdev_random-p7+xsched+ext3_0.9.14-2414p8+elevator > > > > But I still get the same problem with "Cached". > > > > Now I'm trying to see if it could be ext3 with: > > 2.4.14-ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8 > > > > And I haven't noticed the problem after 16 hours uptime. Sometimes it would > > show earlier, or later. > > > > Ah. So are you saying that it does *not* occur on > ext3, but that it does occur on ext2? > I have been able to see the same problem with 2.4.14-ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8. > Could you retest ext2 with this: > I am running unpatched 2.4.14 now. Do you still want me to try this patch now that you know I have been able to see the problem with 2.2.14+ext3? Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/