Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750787AbWJHGjt (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 02:39:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750789AbWJHGjt (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 02:39:49 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:63498 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750787AbWJHGjt (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 02:39:49 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 08:39:43 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2) Message-ID: <20061008063943.GB6755@stusta.de> References: <20061008045522.GG29474@stusta.de> <1160283948.10192.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1160283948.10192.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2251 Lines: 55 On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:05:48AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 06:55 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:43:51PM -0700, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 23:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > > Subject : NFSv4 fails to mount (timeout) > > > > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7274 > > > > Submitter : Torsten Kaiser > > > > Guilty : Trond Myklebust > > > > commit 51b6ded4d9a94a61035deba1d8f51a54e3a3dd86 > > > > Handled-By : Trond Myklebust > > > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7274 > > > > Status : patch available > > > > > > Thanks... Always nice to hear that you have been judged and found > > > guilty. Now go and reread that fucking bug report... > > > > As far as I understand it it is the sum of two bugs, and one of them > > is the one from commit 51b6ded4d9a94a61035deba1d8f51a54e3a3dd86. > > That really comes across in the above message. I read it and immediately > thought "that must be two bugs". It contains one kernel bug plus a non-kernel bug. Many people (including myself) are often "guilty" of introducing a kernel bug - that's simply normal. > In any case, what the fuck gives you the right to appoint yourself judge > and jury over kernel regressions? I've given this right myself - everyone can always send any bug list he wants to linux-kernel. I already did the same during 2.6.15 development. Besides being a nice way to show people that the "noone tests -rc kernels" theory is wrong, it also points people at the known regressions and might result in more of them being fixed. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/