Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp432586pxf; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:20:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1lTkiXN5I6FOR1uNm3Cl9r3UqCrejaENGnynKbFmHNpAwBG3hH7QMkkfgr91CuX5ieg9O X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5495:: with SMTP id r21mr9766998ejo.471.1616682025679; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:20:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616682025; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hFHKip0EvZvdJrku3YMBpoNYWD8zCdE7KQPRZAl1dXBhhugheZLMZ0s5RdSJ7keWUV dkvC6SqnCSob7V4KoFxuil+VlHAzgwi4EoBha2oLPZBwvQMAvN1DX51ZfjnPS2oj0CJG TuGVpTGWUNEACf1k14fWnxTew42/XJoCdqiZwAu9Ov2tayEBRSR3sLW82ie2CmP1cIsk 4xRKeXUM0Jn/hI8sjkX9DvwkhFm1vP82Bso7YVeuEyFg/wPK7qSdKmhn//7zRcNiKSQP BcmrUWaeXW1QpHp5W0WIt/BaXww4mKowF8TttNYlS5NVNBG856pBzGAqetWwfYIl+VYw d0SQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=lMu1u0tgdpKUYdK0Y2edV56h3EG24/y18/fAyUCWVWo=; b=Y1qI1KPMEh9B451jIHQShvj3QHjSaXkNgsKdgKwpfNPSJqCeYyGYzm8+5aZmG9u3ol smYYyBgIs33GxXQdql0H/iWt1KJdx2bW8iQEVsTKdocVXZiEXO3Q0ml2yOrjyz3OeOa6 C64Axgggj5a1YIHOtjuw01m/oC/wl1QJQtj3BJ9HQjmOw9Of8sfi5yh5cDn27knkynM0 oN0d15KXuhLHI6gVXDiXkms4+8fSxX2k2jkXyeGJLDOn156cgyDZa/hXG6n+HlNFtW8J ss9EhQm1HzusLhDvw2AAjVyeUcJoip8chdvMVRB60MpHOPABRIDGW3ojnCskyE5XPIe+ Ij5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=RbjSEQfq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s10si4339520ejv.67.2021.03.25.07.20.00; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=RbjSEQfq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229574AbhCYOSx (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:18:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48422 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229547AbhCYOSb (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3267C06174A; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id ce10so3191127ejb.6; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lMu1u0tgdpKUYdK0Y2edV56h3EG24/y18/fAyUCWVWo=; b=RbjSEQfqNEssxKbJqIH/emUW3jSbq9bgkMVtMsexGztaajgm+fopQefEDxTPfEaDIb FVO53ZNlI1hsSzxMiyfd+OssWBBSeB+fZTI4mw22lXVF+ItJhweULzi3KcSISHl9fc6Z uyYcjwB/mOGr56dLrk9UO608Wg1Kg8l7Egglol76u7z9losnL8FdpcIQAqW1bsRXaX0U qlRjkh/aG1c225VZti7tuHpguitH9L+1frIE2ZwhHSPkVsXy31F14bWaCM1Qx9S00rLx rMIMXH0WQRMuKUuMEaiiyYgRmbo75EQVt9xEZGWlRyjFMTHA0UQPlet9J8xEeaFAnxhZ tHJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lMu1u0tgdpKUYdK0Y2edV56h3EG24/y18/fAyUCWVWo=; b=owSoQKmvPLxfGvn1I/xv7A0VM9Oj2f5XOFByaA74Jq4WUbQlzlAW9yKc22iY1zIv1s Qs3f+fFRvORZinkGNpC3Ghwq9+ymH65CK70OY/RDuyCNw7mC6Mqzn0Qq2TQYs5oaw8yp PW/R8wMZh1mTZsDvgtaIXlOg2QRJKGnOe7yuRDRFfUz9blpmVE5DiBSH/i2ircZwZ/q6 kenEzOsqoEckuLw5BXr+desAB4Kmz1e42eq+KdhhunBzf/1iw2ys7DMfwOLDaMg6P1Ke EBAmIiOEFqtzLfzmcBQgHQ7e6l7LUZhpJWTSjMMNon4JqkrG6nPgyvLlTpFGdeS0FJ8a aUng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533S3B2qpzuKhVd5gwL1+7uuJ3Qic6cbmJRfrgS4DfrpwJhnscam f9uY5F+Fw9LRKA7jl5iy0s8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:e8f:: with SMTP id ho15mr9886768ejc.541.1616681908525; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (54033286.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [84.3.50.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p19sm2793453edr.57.2021.03.25.07.18.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:18:20 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Marco Elver , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Mark Rutland , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Alexander Potapenko , Al Viro , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jens Axboe , Matt Morehouse , Peter Collingbourne , Ian Rogers , kasan-dev , linux-arch , linux-fsdevel , LKML , the arch/x86 maintainers , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] perf: Add breakpoint information to siginfo on SIGTRAP Message-ID: <20210325141820.GA1456211@gmail.com> References: <20210324112503.623833-1-elver@google.com> <20210324112503.623833-8-elver@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Marco Elver wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 15:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > One last try, I'll leave it alone now, I promise :-) > > > > This looks like it does what you suggested, thanks! :-) > > > > I'll still need to think about it, because of the potential problem > > with modify-signal-races and what the user's synchronization story > > would look like then. > > I agree that this looks inherently racy. The attr can't be allocated > on stack, user synchronization may be tricky and expensive. The API > may provoke bugs and some users may not even realize the race problem. Yeah, so why cannot we allocate enough space from the signal handler user-space stack and put the attr there, and point to it from sig_info? The idea would be to create a stable, per-signal snapshot of whatever the perf_attr state is at the moment the event happens and the signal is generated - which is roughly what user-space wants, right? Thanks, Ingo