Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp448772pxf; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:36:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIJ4b+xJnywLcAq24Ha1+Cgg9DEc/NNRnuBGWeY3AZLkQ/FsozTzyqJ+bZ1TrCZUYdU4aC X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:73cd:: with SMTP id n13mr9476546ejl.535.1616682986288; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:36:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616682986; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kTFrn+CLXe2a4EtPQ2ceoRn1XujYsIz2pD1HCmOBg0x7SMbioAQ/AA8Oo1qaMgW0aJ TIdBBlTyNDe0/Dlv120JPJProAIS+w6uXbd86oYfcpEOZ8gFoh1kvzA87l/76g4MdsHp /2QYSHF1DSKhKqdTVThicpIwGnPRGsJ3rB2wNYFUZgJceKl4iWPOxLJ1Zgbdbm9QzIXL 6rTuyBi8B3kA9ia9GE5CSK+HBQ3sFHAq72PtlqZBz6iXeyDJBxkgL+nngNsXzA0oHC3b 9/LeWcirrHGoi746RQ8nbJj0MWDk/1x6g6RZQH/+RP8hwEcztucY36mwX5YQ5zIa1/LH Lm6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=NMSTDs2sT1HKUObCZBCLbqCgORYwgdO/R5e4lA1/tKY=; b=BMTCb1kUfAvic4JAxOq7PaySEi9KldkYT5gBxe+HAAgqbG8bv1gWmHbs0s/Lhew0bQ +mIT1y7P2UHDx3JZk7SZbQpmvUQ6WB4SgNO5TcLAM0zXK+a02UcENaZfCxZWqeWtpdPD zSBcaQqWE5ECm7rw0Ewey8LEwCD9wi6vNag5nmD20zLra4B/M5k+ps2IyiSsKqPHVcK9 huk6L2ssym2I9vN9NvTzSXLE9AXmsMGRDYbDf6Ef1inXhQ28P7O9E+6wGk4cs9i0xzyK GMF+VwY7jmkO3zgvO0qmMunD0X1EN4FsFM5bsKp+oP/ammzeB/YUenYhlGtUK0PJ47pM 3RmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n19si4308323ejx.370.2021.03.25.07.36.02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231494AbhCYOek (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:34:40 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45042 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230433AbhCYOea (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:34:30 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0434CAD80; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C03DE1E4415; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:34:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:34:28 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Christian Brauner Cc: Jan Kara , Amir Goldstein , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH] fanotify_user: use upper_32_bits() to verify mask Message-ID: <20210325143428.GD13673@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20210325083742.2334933-1-brauner@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210325083742.2334933-1-brauner@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 25-03-21 09:37:43, Christian Brauner wrote: > From: Christian Brauner > > I don't see an obvious reason why the upper 32 bit check needs to be > open-coded this way. Switch to upper_32_bits() which is more idiomatic and > should conceptually be the same check. > > Cc: Amir Goldstein > Cc: Jan Kara > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Thanks for the cleanup. I've added it to my tree. Honza > --- > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > index 9e0c1afac8bd..d5683fa9d495 100644 > --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > @@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ static int do_fanotify_mark(int fanotify_fd, unsigned int flags, __u64 mask, > __func__, fanotify_fd, flags, dfd, pathname, mask); > > /* we only use the lower 32 bits as of right now. */ > - if (mask & ((__u64)0xffffffff << 32)) > + if (upper_32_bits(mask)) > return -EINVAL; > > if (flags & ~FANOTIFY_MARK_FLAGS) > > base-commit: 0d02ec6b3136c73c09e7859f0d0e4e2c4c07b49b > -- > 2.27.0 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR