Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp845971pxf; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:39:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzi9atHWhp02sZHY2DGDBvU2hojb/7m2OrztMA0ZW5Q0ip2WEoslvC14btBGnWF5yHc7RTq X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7f01:: with SMTP id d1mr12299180ejr.136.1616711991965; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:39:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616711991; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qMv4IWnk+VN4XMxvS9nfRWnpH5mU1c1HJuLNExQC7s7lap/hJbEhzpM9SiR9eCBrKb LVWxgwRfXosR89HgyVkdDVhjnHLgUebun3aBKMnOLSHJdz/gFBauLfun1HEmH3Gq4Kp1 ++MOuLbl/oLs1J8iJyYIpjUCDj4PucVSu78iLrjAwth0j9N+E8rvsMHpHlAbWZwaYGne EruESytnUv8gZEN0waMWyFg1epJbuKb+FjtC8wh0fhcETBaBLJW1HT7zP3Olg5UoyMjn G0QcD7ywj8nXFJSIwT4tTaigAhg8cLsUCGr2eOuG/CwWQz3wl4dDI5udbgivmQqovOSz n08w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=SPJBpRy3R9mFfMF6pdvZDady42C+XlqArOxVCK6oVWM=; b=Y6CTdOCTeF4fRLAg9HuqkrkCAIiv1Emp8agaSqjBFB7g7ossxlEoUPcDH79gQlEiYE fNV+eMdC6oFjClRMJRuIuVECmnxNc0MBlwgq63EBdHOXnUQrUz4ZWjAiRtXAstJfe0LA lPYOM1Afg1D812HKUYPbRLUJ44akEgbwVgT8MknJCnyNCbktxZYL+aPorjztlKABSEhS +zNv7W9x51stfzV3PhdlJOIIbOW2kkghpxBNJ4byfLVe4t5Em+yz/8Yp4z87ZRG+xUMM SXF9v5HziODiHGspQh/sOVuIdco/EVW479kI38FuUXE9OZsfZJEQLcg4ZdmYO8V3gLTV j5iA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=GzjcNL0W; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si5405389edw.476.2021.03.25.15.39.29; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=GzjcNL0W; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231289AbhCYWi2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:38:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231161AbhCYWiT (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:38:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEAF2C06174A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id t18so1642665pjs.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:38:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=SPJBpRy3R9mFfMF6pdvZDady42C+XlqArOxVCK6oVWM=; b=GzjcNL0W6qznBEXmz0l/PS0tZuqWqpIbM+EHd/fQjdQjR/jyzcS3HTWKo/fqBj/qna JTe4dWoj1S+mkS1xITOVLOWjomCs8AoPIIJyX9yXn9YbzP9nvmsk6Qu94mAolpJgH8MA YQedl3lq8dvhSNcer0VHSrpU0F9vzDyB3cSWvzvL2EcG/3f9j/Im6Lxl1XorjpyzgO+I eNHn0kKqeyEqdzpawXZIJObBlfEosHaYMEesZE2uFy30pKK7sJQSfMGpBj50IbfWs9Cf Gx2DeVGYe6UMhrsB1MLFobFuVtuyShnvEt5hdm0ZIlntlRBXggH4vOjhPnLUM+thJgPX nr6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=SPJBpRy3R9mFfMF6pdvZDady42C+XlqArOxVCK6oVWM=; b=rrOgfzcq4Am+PuS8j3lykFEXHxegFtkJm24eUY9MSFenGmpGlP/QA3rJpjQVcf9it5 Zod8M1SOFUeH+HbXu8Lwa8QLP14Av34kPIHsXMsd5+BEZ+bd3DzkptkQP9GBw60B8N5i 9I/azR/+XfF6rrqeVUts2gtXomWshHIpKQ4sHd+u40CWct8LIP/m1HL+szat8w+Eyssv PvavJ3wYx4FAbeGUXSZ9qxZwSeldhD9tF0OMnh7j/Afb+4v7ZVjcl+FqvxkLkqxyrENj QeIDHZx/VvChPewgjv6obzq3IZY6kO7XDqSiq+UuPO3DmXPoFHPmmvruuh5huq4XCyaa 2F3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53061aNeG9hMkd3SO0jARsetQ68FkQr3QOPe0q8U4KtnbPFDkzb5 JBPAqy+cDVeOuH43N8Nn2+Lr+w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1651:: with SMTP id il17mr11050782pjb.16.1616711898276; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm6494878pgi.24.2021.03.25.15.38.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:38:15 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Rob Herring , Alexandre Torgue , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: stm32: add capability to detach Message-ID: <20210325223815.GA1982573@xps15> References: <20210322092651.7381-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20210322092651.7381-3-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20210323211911.GA1714890@xps15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210323211911.GA1714890@xps15> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:19:11PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good day Arnaud, > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:26:51AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > > From: Arnaud Pouliquen > > > > A mechanism similar to the shutdown mailbox signal is implemented to > > detach a remote processor. > > > > Upon detachment, a signal is sent to the remote firmware, allowing it > > to perform specific actions such as stopping RPMsg communication. > > > > The Cortex-M hold boot is also disabled to allow the remote processor > > to restart in case of crash. > > > > Notice that for this feature to be supported, the remote firmware > > resource table must be stored at the beginning of a 1kB section > > (default size provided to the remoteproc core). > > > > This restriction should be lifted in the future by using a backup > > register to store the actual size of the resource table. > > I'm not sure the above two paragraphs add anything valuable to the changelog. > At this time the size of 1kB is fixed and future enhancement are, well, in the > future. So for now this patch is working with the rest of the current > environment and that is the important part. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > > index 3d45f51de4d0..298ef5b19e27 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ > > #define RELEASE_BOOT 1 > > > > #define MBOX_NB_VQ 2 > > -#define MBOX_NB_MBX 3 > > +#define MBOX_NB_MBX 4 > > > > #define STM32_SMC_RCC 0x82001000 > > #define STM32_SMC_REG_WRITE 0x1 > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ > > #define STM32_MBX_VQ1 "vq1" > > #define STM32_MBX_VQ1_ID 1 > > #define STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN "shutdown" > > +#define STM32_MBX_DETACH "detach" > > > > #define RSC_TBL_SIZE 1024 > > > > @@ -336,6 +337,15 @@ static const struct stm32_mbox stm32_rproc_mbox[MBOX_NB_MBX] = { > > .tx_done = NULL, > > .tx_tout = 500, /* 500 ms time out */ > > }, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = STM32_MBX_DETACH, > > + .vq_id = -1, > > + .client = { > > + .tx_block = true, > > + .tx_done = NULL, > > + .tx_tout = 200, /* 200 ms time out to detach should be fair enough */ > > + }, > > } > > }; > > > > @@ -461,6 +471,25 @@ static int stm32_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc) > > return stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, true); > > } > > > > +static int stm32_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) > > +{ > > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > > + int err, dummy_data, idx; > > + > > + /* Inform the remote processor of the detach */ > > + idx = stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(rproc, STM32_MBX_DETACH); > > + if (idx >= 0 && ddata->mb[idx].chan) { > > + /* A dummy data is sent to allow to block on transmit */ > > + err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan, > > + &dummy_data); > > + if (err < 0) > > + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "warning: remote FW detach without ack\n"); > > + } > > + > > + /* Allow remote processor to auto-reboot */ > > + return stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, false); > > +} > > + > > static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > > { > > struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > > @@ -597,7 +626,11 @@ stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz) > > } > > > > done: > > - /* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */ > > + /* > > + * Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair. > > + * Notice for the detach, that this 1 kB memory area has to be reserved in the coprocessor > > + * firmware for the resource table. A clean of this whole area is done on detach. > > + */ > > Can you rework the last sentence? I'm not sure if it means the M4 will clean > the resource table or if that should be the application processor... I'm also > not clear on what you mean by "clean". Usually it means zero'ing out but in > this case it means a re-initialisation of the original values. > > > > *table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE; > > return (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va; > > } > > @@ -607,6 +640,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { > > .start = stm32_rproc_start, > > .stop = stm32_rproc_stop, > > .attach = stm32_rproc_attach, > > + .detach = stm32_rproc_detach, > > With the above: > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier Thanks for the firmware test image: Tested-by: Mathieu Poirier > > > .kick = stm32_rproc_kick, > > .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > > .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw, > > -- > > 2.17.1 > >