Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <2e667826f183fbef101a62f0ad8ccb4ed253cb75.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: Add support for getsockopt(..., ..., UDP_GRO, ...,
 ...)
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To:     Norman Maurer <norman_maurer@apple.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:22:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CF78DCAD-6F2C-46C4-9FF1-61DF66183C76@apple.com>
References: <20210325195614.800687-1-norman_maurer@apple.com>
         <8eadc07055ac1c99bbc55ea10c7b98acc36dde55.camel@redhat.com>
         <CF78DCAD-6F2C-46C4-9FF1-61DF66183C76@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 11:22 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote:
> On 26. Mar 2021, at 10:36, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> > One thing you can do to simplifies the maintainer's life, would be post
> > a v2 with the correct tag (and ev. obsolete this patch in patchwork).
> 
> I am quite new to contribute patches to the kernel so I am not sure
> how I would “obsolete” this patch and make a v2. If you can give me
> some pointers I am happy to do so.

Well, I actually gave you a bad advice about fiddling with patchwork.

The autoritative documentation:

Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst

(inside the kernel tree) suggests to avoid it.

Just posting a v2 will suffice.

Thanks!

Paolo