Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932066AbWJHVg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:36:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751489AbWJHVg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:36:27 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]:24375 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751488AbWJHVg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:36:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JGELQezwSTfgK2WbQUlc1Wicxtfuai7BRq4podO+3CjKC479kzsm8aJQqlqtVHqyiKiub4pix/v5+cGS4S+Iu0f4byeh55cDY5Fn+IkZJ4yAx1bUpKwLCFzVLUV8VdjCS0Dd+6QixKXs3zXOe/SuCW1/4kJQKvHkxN+FIOJd9+o= Message-ID: <653402b90610081436w34d692ecv2dd9801c451ab490@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:36:26 +0200 From: "Miguel Ojeda" To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1 V9] drivers: add LCD support Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061008211550.GE4152@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061006002950.49b25189.maxextreme@gmail.com> <20061008182438.GA4033@ucw.cz> <653402b90610081137g7885fc85h54e5e94de682a246@mail.gmail.com> <20061008191217.GA3788@elf.ucw.cz> <653402b90610081312m32fcf7ecx9929ae9dc4768c17@mail.gmail.com> <20061008211550.GE4152@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1185 Lines: 28 On 10/8/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Yep... but when we have /dev/fbcfag12864b ... do we need > /dev/cfag12864bX ? I think it is useless at that point. > Well, because cfag12864b is the generic one I think it should be in the /dev directory (whatever if you use or don't it / whatever if it is useless or not). > > /dev/fbcfag12864b is very easy to "manipulate by hand" too. > Yep, IMO we should add a Kconfig option instead of mixing both by default (cfag12864b and fbcfag12864b); anyway I think having cfag12864b & fbcfag12864b is better than mixing it all in one module. It is a good idea that adds many advantages; althought I don't know if other people will agree with adding it. I have no problem coding the fbcfag12864b module in my free time; but I prefer to remain the other modules as they are now and add the fbcfag12864b later in time: I'm waiting them to get into one of the -rcs without more radical changes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/