Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:19:43 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>, mingo@kernel.org,
        mgorman@suse.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        bristot@redhat.com, joshdon@google.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] debugfs: Implement debugfs_create_str()
Message-ID: <YF3tfxJsJIyGQBD2@kroah.com>
References: <20210326103352.603456266@infradead.org>
 <20210326103935.183934395@infradead.org>
 <YF2/41K4xs3ZOQdV@kroah.com>
 <YF3DF+T8nPRgt7Ao@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YF3F0JbbEpeSGzW6@kroah.com>
 <YF3Hv5zXb/6lauzs@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <70594935-18e6-0791-52f9-0448adf37155@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <YF3aSJ7OYiCpWsl8@kroah.com>
 <1da9e61c-6973-2e0e-d898-7bf92ac5b1c4@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <20210326141235.GI4746@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210326141235.GI4746@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:12:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:10:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > On 26/03/2021 13.57, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 01:53:59PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > >> On 26/03/2021 12.38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Implement debugfs_create_str() to easily display names and such in
> > >>> debugfs.
> > >>
> > >> Patches 7-9 don't seem to add any users of this. What's it for precisely?
> > > 
> > > It's used in patch 7, look close :)
> > 
> > Ah, macrology. But the write capability doesn't seem used, and I (still)
> > fail to see how that could be useful.
> 
> Correct, it isn't used. But I didn't think it would be acceptible to
> not implement the write side. OTOH, if Greg would be okay with it, I can
> change it to:
> 
> ssize_t debugfs_write_file_str(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf,
>                                size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
>         /* This is really only for read-only strings */
>         return -EINVAL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_write_file_str);
> 
> That's certianly simpler.

Fine with me.  Might as well make it static and not exported as well if
you are touching it :)