Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1413649pxf; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:25:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzM3sZXi8fIPt1ZhQIm0X2+jQNYsqiJuxZNH35cE3Y+haRkPOEEEqT4oAipVj7kfu4tIZAr X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:10c9:: with SMTP id p9mr15550001edu.268.1616768712539; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:25:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616768712; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SOgZEB99rX0iRoy6k7UXqaSRdwZAhX7Y0VecRkDGHUqcJP2aHGnAJt2y7keQScAc1r dx822qe7GOjYbkGkof7rOR5wrHQuOKHclKnbvWM1XETAMQx24jyrV8oGfqMsGqck6GP6 yHITLONRvmHOCmMSHGRwPCHvwch/E5tUYTXkFMrzLP2DCJrp9M3+lwShO1vEZnrnF+Ct PMKez/gy4vHRLF4QDaCwxy0QHCQ2/Jk+uUm9yPdmbzEHsOAK67BE60G0DGSJE7svz3ET 3lXyhAmMYgvxM5vP+TgsDOiGXC8Cix8h1u7xzjkiagy7kG00BEcsB/hl+dA2QiXwD46F ikrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :references:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=hiYYMuSGtUxuJHxwx4NFJyHebtaUSA1v/Jrod5zbAAY=; b=r6WULoObarOjp42X099GCF28yLqHh67NkgJepqduB4KLfa/VeOB1lzIcqmWrzwBRmT kGX+8L4bmRYQLQn4dCw8dw/zd8/AZ70bl7+O6JkC241IE6bquq0TZX/RN30P5LnPNCzm HeZCsQI4GLyBLOHC6s7p9BuiqIljzldnd9LEMn4ExfgbWWjFakbpy0DlIPukqfCyqh+4 JGHjwDAbjUHnmq9mznFw6tgXBgjwMUmPVG56rUjRwC5bcixVs0L5Cj8wQlRVTFbAjdFj JbYviFMrYoDz4i68/I8hlX6H4FY30DGnlqfX0pwfAS3HISxZfqa8tv//JcQDmjNJJcJ9 DjyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fSA0bolP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z7si6405019eja.451.2021.03.26.07.24.48; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fSA0bolP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230076AbhCZOXb (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:23:31 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:22576 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230194AbhCZOXA (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:23:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616768579; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hiYYMuSGtUxuJHxwx4NFJyHebtaUSA1v/Jrod5zbAAY=; b=fSA0bolPwBG63Q/HVGkQTaUWyE2jn71KjTw2vGOFKLmZ6AJfecNzPyZ1pJmsUINTvL/kji t//HTC/jARKdf6jS7DtTEoGRzF1Tof4sEwbbs3d2L04mQDBMK14M0+ANu0X/rfmDHtzQCN kFUqs8k6NfM9ytqPEP2y4Nx+jDglwVE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-347-BdSci58rPgWwzEHRpWXxVg-1; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:22:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: BdSci58rPgWwzEHRpWXxVg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298F287504F; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.81] (ovpn-112-81.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.81]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881E118035; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm/gup: check page hwposion status for coredump. From: David Hildenbrand To: Aili Yao , Matthew Wilcox , akpm@linux-foundation.org, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangfeng1@kingsoft.com, sunhao2@kingsoft.com, Oscar Salvador , Mike Kravetz References: <20210317163714.328a038d@alex-virtual-machine> <20a0d078-f49d-54d6-9f04-f6b41dd51e5f@redhat.com> <20210318044600.GJ3420@casper.infradead.org> <20210318133412.12078eb7@alex-virtual-machine> <20210319104437.6f30e80d@alex-virtual-machine> <20210320003516.GC3420@casper.infradead.org> <20210322193318.377c9ce9@alex-virtual-machine> Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:22:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26.03.21 15:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 22.03.21 12:33, Aili Yao wrote: >> When we do coredump for user process signal, this may be one SIGBUS signal >> with BUS_MCEERR_AR or BUS_MCEERR_AO code, which means this signal is >> resulted from ECC memory fail like SRAR or SRAO, we expect the memory >> recovery work is finished correctly, then the get_dump_page() will not >> return the error page as its process pte is set invalid by >> memory_failure(). >> >> But memory_failure() may fail, and the process's related pte may not be >> correctly set invalid, for current code, we will return the poison page, >> get it dumped, and then lead to system panic as its in kernel code. >> >> So check the hwpoison status in get_dump_page(), and if TRUE, return NULL. >> >> There maybe other scenario that is also better to check hwposion status >> and not to panic, so make a wrapper for this check, Thanks to David's >> suggestion(). >> >> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210319104437.6f30e80d@alex-virtual-machine >> Signed-off-by: Aili Yao >> Cc: David Hildenbrand >> Cc: Matthew Wilcox >> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi >> Cc: Oscar Salvador >> Cc: Mike Kravetz >> Cc: Aili Yao >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton >> --- >> mm/gup.c | 4 ++++ >> mm/internal.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >> index e4c224c..6f7e1aa 100644 >> --- a/mm/gup.c >> +++ b/mm/gup.c >> @@ -1536,6 +1536,10 @@ struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr) >> FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_DUMP | FOLL_GET); >> if (locked) >> mmap_read_unlock(mm); > > Thinking again, wouldn't we get -EFAULT from __get_user_pages_locked() > when stumbling over a hwpoisoned page? > > See __get_user_pages_locked()->__get_user_pages()->faultin_page(): > > handle_mm_fault()->vm_fault_to_errno(), which translates > VM_FAULT_HWPOISON to -EFAULT, unless FOLL_HWPOISON is set (-> -EHWPOISON) > > ? Or doesn't that happen as you describe "But memory_failure() may fail, and the process's related pte may not be correctly set invalid" -- but why does that happen? On a similar thought, should get_user_pages() never return a page that has HWPoison set? E.g., check also for existing PTEs if the page is hwpoisoned? @Naoya, Oscar -- Thanks, David / dhildenb