Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:06:26 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Cc:     heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cl@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
        kever.yang@rock-chips.com, tony.xie@rock-chips.com,
        finley.xiao@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to
 json-schema
Message-ID: <20210326200626.GA3776228@robh.at.kernel.org>
References: <20210326102738.14767-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
 <20210326103036.15173-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210326103036.15173-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:30:36PM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to
> json-schema and move to the power bindings directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20210225102643.653095-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/
> ---
>  .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml      | 291 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt    | 136 --------
>  2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt

My review checks tell me I already reviewed this and IIRC that was 
pointed out to you in the last version. Am I supposed to review the 
whole thing again or is it unchanged or ???. I have no idea with no 
version history.

As there are other issues pointed out, I'm going with 'wait for the next 
version'.

Rob