Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
To:     davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>, rdunlap@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfrm_user.c: Added a punctuation
Date:   Sat, 27 Mar 2021 04:42:54 +0530
Message-Id: <20210326231608.24407-18-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1616797633.git.unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1616797633.git.unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


s/wouldnt/wouldn\'t/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 5a0ef4361e43..df8bc8fc724c 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1761,7 +1761,7 @@ static int xfrm_add_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,

 	/* shouldn't excl be based on nlh flags??
 	 * Aha! this is anti-netlink really i.e  more pfkey derived
-	 * in netlink excl is a flag and you wouldnt need
+	 * in netlink excl is a flag and you wouldn't need
 	 * a type XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY - JHS */
 	excl = nlh->nlmsg_type == XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY;
 	err = xfrm_policy_insert(p->dir, xp, excl);
--
2.26.2