Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932306AbWJIHfy (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 03:35:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932312AbWJIHfy (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 03:35:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:23786 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932306AbWJIHfx (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 03:35:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4529FBBE.9070206@suse.de> Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:35:26 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux kernel mailing list , Reloc Kernel List , ebiederm@xmission.com, ak@suse.de, horms@verge.net.au, lace@jankratochvil.net, hpa@zytor.com, magnus.damm@gmail.com, lwang@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com, maneesh@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] i386: Distinguish absolute symbols References: <20061003170032.GA30036@in.ibm.com> <20061003170413.GA3164@in.ibm.com> <20061006233547.43888a48.akpm@osdl.org> <20061008164713.GA7149@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20061008164713.GA7149@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1622 Lines: 37 >> looks odd. What's the point in putting a gap before __smp_alt_end? Moving >> __smp_alt_end to before the ALIGN doesn't prevent the warning. >> > Please find attached a patch for the same. I am also copying Gerd Hoffmann, > who introduced this ALIGN. Gerd, can you please confirm that above ALIGN() > is not required and the patch attached should be fine. The data between __smp_alt_start and __smp_alt_end will be released at boot time in some cases (UP machine, kernel without CPU_HOTPLUG, ...). Releasing memory works at page granularity only, thats why I added the alignment. I think you can't simply drop it. > o There seems to be one extra ALIGN(4096) before symbol __smp_alt_end. The > only usage of __smp_alt_end is to mark the end of smp alternative > sections so that this memory can be freed. As a physical page is freed > one has to just make sure that there is no other data on the same page > where __smp_alt_end is pointing. There is already a ALIGN(4096) after > this section which should take care of the above issue. Hence it looks > like the ALIGN(4096) before __smp_alt_end is redundant and not required. Hmm, ok, it should work then. How about adding a comment to make sure the align after __smp_alt_end doesn't get dropped by accident? cheers, Gerd -- Gerd Hoffmann http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/