Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp2111634pxf; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:59:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUdVUQmvmLt6YAnQuTVnaE2vCy+sSW+eROQjE2z+qx7uiUicO6QGBEHGdn75XIY1cpUkc0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ae96:: with SMTP id md22mr18745844ejb.409.1616839169915; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:59:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616839169; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=B+ekpQmFAYvFPYuJj+eAl/rwnXjarg/2X5FzIFsuu6oCkD0Yi++iP8TlsaLGFEkR6y 6i8E0C1gXvfkFAJqgEJsY1ZHA5WmOdzL2nZLUoqAbd1Ws2mHQcQXWhI/0EMg+nq2dWO5 mg/r75ei8XPfXJrGlpIfKnP7mVOtdIkgQOOkfJofKKG2PV3kOb8XjkpFnZ0F+FKNGzrH HDQuwfyQ3sODqG9+ND9DwwHmVNV3veqGV5iBfX5FEkqOZ3w0lubIX5ag0O0pNAadPPcp 5GM2ZayFOr18pQ9ccqaZhgSouAaKnsdfH+tApdo6mQ6ylE4zSGJpolQCgDVX4yW5TZEw PXvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=k+ipG60sUAWdM0mqLG+DjWMJhDPMIEcu9AshEDIlWMg=; b=x2DPN7oaylXBco7LYZVqEVpdJ6tANeahCXCyeTv+RlN/1ZDcIidIwXRvjcSLXOnk4+ sWAfsAj9qYBEhydvZanoLh6XkBVAC+VewoReHIMrmfvsLnMwBD0/ty2ivZR9CJzMFEs2 f7ZZVndsS4ievVmGXCogUFG47EKwZ4tbzJSDySx4rn+LCFyZ98BZTF5r+RUi7k1uNayl 7iw7tmBfj4T6IX0DoCgzl1Al7WpU3ZIkfO6YICYv3mEK3FfGqDur1/Kc0XbAQfRrDGal b/OAT7caHYfjtxCEZXwWBieGuPAvqavj6NBN9IHkfUdEfQ8+RcvG+z3sH5BISUE49m9a R4xQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e7si8643810edn.416.2021.03.27.02.59.08; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231192AbhC0Jzv (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 05:55:51 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:14933 "EHLO szxga06-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231285AbhC0JzZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 05:55:25 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F6vLF3gxBzkgHw; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:53:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.40.192.162) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:55:20 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] ACPI: LPSS: fix some coding style issues To: Andy Shevchenko References: <1616831193-17920-1-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com> <1616831193-17920-7-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com> CC: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "rui.zhang@intel.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxarm@openeuler.org" From: Xiaofei Tan Message-ID: <38357624-0886-f8e6-906d-c230c28b386c@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:55:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.40.192.162] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, On 2021/3/27 16:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Saturday, March 27, 2021, Xiaofei Tan > wrote: > > Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl > , including > following types: > > WARNING: simple_strtol is obsolete, use kstrtol instead > WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations > > > > First of all, two changes ==> two patches. > I thought it would be better to include more simple cleanup in one patch. > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan > > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c > index be73974..2df231e 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c > @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static void byt_i2c_setup(struct > lpss_private_data *pdata) > > /* Expected to always be true, but better safe then sorry */ > if (uid_str) > - uid = simple_strtol(uid_str, NULL, 10); > + uid = kstrtol(uid_str, NULL, 10); > > > How did you test this? Is there any guarantee that input is > null-terminated number? > > Where is the check of returned value from `kstrtol()`? > > Yes, you haven’t tested that at all. Don’t submit patches you are not > able to test and haven’t tested. > It's my fault. Sorry for that, i will fix it. > NAK. > > > /* Detect I2C bus shared with PUNIT and ignore its d3 status */ > status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SEM", NULL, > &shared_host); > @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id > acpi_lpss_device_ids[] = { > static int is_memory(struct acpi_resource *res, void *not_used) > { > struct resource r; > + > return !acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r); > } > > @@ -1200,6 +1201,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_poweroff_noirq(struct > device *dev) > if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) { > /* This is analogous to the > acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq() case. */ > int ret = acpi_lpss_do_poweroff_late(dev); > + > if (ret) > return ret; > } > -- > 2.8.1 > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >