Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp2112713pxf; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 03:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/znXnQSF3sxjcIYlO905HMGrD3oDWnXPU+eBX4Vm1dCJBhyAgOGkMA8PgNwHqc530FCQY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2c44:: with SMTP id f4mr18769890ejh.508.1616839267923; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 03:01:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616839267; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rpTbzRmHYT4MLlmzONZnfNh/A44Dwwom0MVsJP87m1PdBCyaupy/FVuBKeWv6w734B ANj+mypGQfDmaRCvJOneTv1s1V6WapX50BcQPL70mW4A1aRqNgICQsF73YnP+yizwID9 LmCaZtPcaD74/seSPQaJ5nX1kpFPMPCVdlLwLTVPbq8eBzFbJvsqz5iI3virzocdNP6d ioxBkWl8Z/tXjC2f25AnFyvWPJVpXCuwYc5DSqzo0QK0J9nO/+TwrlBwERHvA6uzzveQ Jep9sCXHMaI7m13BO0WBHWMKcNBPsyLR506KpnHUN+dvKiqNd1Fhc+dRedw8+a7tAeai 4vsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=KZSAP1nVDoPTT8etsSjFXsVdt5Xa3rpbBSs2OGSYqcQ=; b=BXxDSA2yq0ftGs/YLkt641B8Z9m5YrXTj54q/7BDoMyR0RZcLO/urlOsfAu71+f1EN CKuJNPNE6BYLA9LbTROASDOHt6B8TTJcyONnIkhGp4XoQKHs7uzotI7GKI6S+lYMrfUV mhr/pvEoehOSpUg7pUhhOwvBUBDZZ8M/XFCl6zLXPuBSEHyNF8o5iS2F04ZVViEbGzLU xU8KBqJLb9o4iLl2Ts5QApIetRmoNSZk55dGplozoB4qy6uS/nGuu/1N5yfSk4UQ57SH uVGtAqQ4gnEOD8Ph4BNQn6VuKzkuJTMmehi+r3q0GyqAXxNRFqVHwn4hJ887KnltLGLa X/mA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a19si8711660ejt.403.2021.03.27.03.00.46; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 03:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231304AbhC0J53 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 05:57:29 -0400 Received: from gecko.sbs.de ([194.138.37.40]:49708 "EHLO gecko.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231420AbhC0J50 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 05:57:26 -0400 Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 12R9uxXA017438 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:57:00 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.2.82]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12R9ux11004549; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:56:59 +0100 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:56:56 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux LED Subsystem , Platform Driver , , Srikanth Krishnakar , Jan Kiszka , Gerd Haeussler , Guenter Roeck , Wim Van Sebroeck , Mark Gross , Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: simatic-ipc-leds: add new driver for Siemens Industial PCs Message-ID: <20210327105645.0632b6e4@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20210315111915.GA14857@duo.ucw.cz> References: <20210315095710.7140-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20210315095710.7140-3-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20210315111915.GA14857@duo.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:19:15 +0100 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > > + struct led_classdev cdev; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static struct simatic_ipc_led simatic_ipc_leds_io[] = { > > > + {1 << 15, "simatic-ipc:green:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-1" }, > > > + {1 << 7, "simatic-ipc:yellow:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-1" > > > }, > > > + {1 << 14, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-2" }, > > > + {1 << 6, "simatic-ipc:yellow:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-2" > > > }, > > > + {1 << 13, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-3" }, > > > + {1 << 5, "simatic-ipc:yellow:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-3" > > > }, > > > > Can you use BIT() macro here? And can it be sorted by the bit > > order? > > There's nothing wrong with << and this order is fine. > > But I still don't like the naming. simantic-ipc: prefix is > useless. Having 6 status leds is not good, either. With some of my questions still not being answered i will probably remove that prefix entirely, not even use "platform:". And i might stick with 6x "status". Since that allows reflecting the labels on the machines, while using "above functions if you can" regards, Henning > > > + struct simatic_ipc_led *led = > > > + container_of(led_cd, struct simatic_ipc_led, > > > cdev); > > > > One line? > > 80 columns. It is fine as it is. > > Best regards, > > Pavel