Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3411140pxf; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:13:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXyeJRUgyZYPkELHzGid3oIIIMaKO8xP4Wv35zNMiEvTReEvubEEEB+skxMVwySf6hmbR8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:170f:: with SMTP id c15mr27098360eje.358.1617005602747; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:13:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617005602; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ghqFkODQy/oWQ9PWLNoZD398Ikc1ouLpRSXmlN7Nf6KjkE+/LpbQ6wpJ9SIPVbT0LB DjRGuGzMRJan/NrboxkkJfgL344D7bWWmW7+yw/bHZeTpKR+1Hla0iaK93R5IDbmHivU otjqpic+jGOixXQpb2XKmX7rpjZ3jjAthRkfHZTswiE6/4EWNuYpwMNXG1AMjuL+XJ0n nL5lIEZBYeQeDrHf7Xqpd7g4L8EvjSQQcy7Sv3WFMikFJwKFSyO/HQQl79ZeE6GAY2q5 MR/kPyJJCHyVabLDKFMZ10CrslQ6i9fn9ImMoM5h/1JMNb51F+zIu4KX1f9w6uGGT97g +1IQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=4C/0GfYznVwMAPIfJ9G/pyoa+79KEz4/CsWe8ZqDSMI=; b=YAucMm6J7hgCU0CGNY46jhVy/5ZQCA4no3tZoJd+4TM+wmnkvj4x2LTN2tSSGKTuq1 AAXcf2GKU0SgAQlM9ZY9QsapRhXFNa6CjUzn3UvnOcKJKvvynUPzkaI5eMRUAHMgK0C3 K770DIk6MQyYsT0mK51eVXZPcdOlQCFp5OGFj6XpU3Xx4/+/qgEZs7zXWvgZ396ZgQ82 iuD5jg+Xl2Etk8fGNDbJxHGyL5FcaaCII+bccVnrycy9QKErrpO5z1b6UPxoyLs01no+ eOF9wlmCeRlwTHnhme7YG8cB8FFcY84xXv8C/qYf8cbRvKJ/J+GLY7FzVYSplYHombwB YwUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=ndKaaju6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h26si12061533edq.453.2021.03.29.01.13.00; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=ndKaaju6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232123AbhC2IJp (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:09:45 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49048 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231947AbhC2IFp (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:05:45 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07A156193A; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:05:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617005144; bh=Stt3el1RGNMbuP8ddki3DXmtkzJ91OnqXkPeQd9NlEk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ndKaaju6F0TPFvDpck37ZTgAnaT/sTmvAyOOuwRSzr5U6zLspzPvNSez7d/ofwWqX ni93gMZMYo9cu98q+4ZJQ2u2HAEVWn662Jdh4rt/I9Paw7dRDbQbOoRhq4o/+Y/afT utT601UBVU/ZdXJi+sxuCP66sSsdplCdbwsprIN4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Colin Ian King , Johannes Berg , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 41/59] mac80211: fix rate mask reset Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:58:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20210329075610.239979344@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210329075608.898173317@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210329075608.898173317@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Berg [ Upstream commit 1944015fe9c1d9fa5e9eb7ffbbb5ef8954d6753b ] Coverity reported the strange "if (~...)" condition that's always true. It suggested that ! was intended instead of ~, but upon further analysis I'm convinced that what really was intended was a comparison to 0xff/0xffff (in HT/VHT cases respectively), since this indicates that all of the rates are enabled. Change the comparison accordingly. I'm guessing this never really mattered because a reset to not having a rate mask is basically equivalent to having a mask that enables all rates. Reported-by: Colin Ian King Fixes: 2ffbe6d33366 ("mac80211: fix and optimize MCS mask handling") Fixes: b119ad6e726c ("mac80211: add rate mask logic for vht rates") Reviewed-by: Colin Ian King Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212112213.36b38078f569.I8546a20c80bc1669058eb453e213630b846e107b@changeid Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/mac80211/cfg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c index 0b82d8da4ab0..0563bde0c285 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c @@ -2752,14 +2752,14 @@ static int ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask(struct wiphy *wiphy, continue; for (j = 0; j < IEEE80211_HT_MCS_MASK_LEN; j++) { - if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j]) { + if (sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xff) { sdata->rc_has_mcs_mask[i] = true; break; } } for (j = 0; j < NL80211_VHT_NSS_MAX; j++) { - if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j]) { + if (sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xffff) { sdata->rc_has_vht_mcs_mask[i] = true; break; } -- 2.30.1