Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3417571pxf; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:26:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwi83d+cYvkf+bR/Mp+4fdPdhHmab7IUSNKyY5xVKXBbkF4hwSwjBg+R3L1LVrRVFLvrz9D X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c0cd:: with SMTP id j13mr28286870edp.41.1617006399007; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:26:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617006399; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i0w45KHyZOp9uuYYXyN3a86VhcfEIc4q7a8QxcC7HAmI2eCjgEbtU1aMJup7UWcn42 lw32/mcz3+NJX5+fc2Ew2Lq/Bpk8ecvPnaplndVKTIijmGf8yRApFUZaPyZT7ixRnw79 P4p09Fha0vr4t5Q3Axu9mT9WgVQCWdW1OkKZHEdGegxv9WLsMAGSHMQxIb8KTfdBOJDV Y8r9mapwA7iPv2Ynw30w4edxHnVm6n1p13g4u1WRMWW9jzkspk7L9qZoTnRcNpM55OQX DA/BFVXsg7AkyZf8V1foBUT5LuQMz8TJLpjCaU7q54YeKU4N/n95lN3cppRmY/bGarvn nT3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=Q7Z6eIZ11eZGEcOuEOJ8KmH6bhHbNS5Am0eseWW6mkA=; b=gV0aySiFyBLFY1rmsWhWaHtBGD1MVOR2TDWdZMvTHRDz0aZr2sLKVv+nJcV7K0oHZM cxLXlgtX9JyfSQgweSPBXj+KmP91oe6U4vzOgaG1ARacxLFeMypNwioNzaaVxAcjGWSd yBfy9ic+KlRPjnCOcKgh/seE+hqphQDIdq7ES0Dg5z3ijAeTcGpSkcpZQgi23vkz/ek4 LCrouxiI4lDXA4Q7P88JOwNVdW+rSKAGqj4SNTxGyLRDZAU4K//qmgoqmUXVbZfasHdi gfrYYXFe7ah/jGJ8rPJCnunKstQ8ycg4ShN5cG1ZkN4tp0KOjnZDo2pl41Ci1pbxzvwJ RNiA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=qDdMevvF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m26si12988877edv.514.2021.03.29.01.26.16; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=qDdMevvF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232772AbhC2IZZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:25:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57716 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233148AbhC2IQk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:16:40 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF14A61477; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:16:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617005774; bh=QzKNGjYBXGZvK+0oTzQfokndILUCu4ieBs+xb2Nd4sg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qDdMevvFktCYf1ED8SDn84x2yZnf7mEiA0SuKk5tTFykMMK2tfHezpx5lmwknIHlW iiQZ1wmSpL+7dUDHjjiBSMjIlQwn75FzEedwOnHbdm/CWUoSLfG9oTG+7eFrOBc/QZ TRTJ/hgDhd6Los4Tj4/2zVAS1NoixbxbaiG3L9t8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Colin Ian King , Johannes Berg , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 077/111] mac80211: fix rate mask reset Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:58:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20210329075617.775630786@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210329075615.186199980@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210329075615.186199980@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Berg [ Upstream commit 1944015fe9c1d9fa5e9eb7ffbbb5ef8954d6753b ] Coverity reported the strange "if (~...)" condition that's always true. It suggested that ! was intended instead of ~, but upon further analysis I'm convinced that what really was intended was a comparison to 0xff/0xffff (in HT/VHT cases respectively), since this indicates that all of the rates are enabled. Change the comparison accordingly. I'm guessing this never really mattered because a reset to not having a rate mask is basically equivalent to having a mask that enables all rates. Reported-by: Colin Ian King Fixes: 2ffbe6d33366 ("mac80211: fix and optimize MCS mask handling") Fixes: b119ad6e726c ("mac80211: add rate mask logic for vht rates") Reviewed-by: Colin Ian King Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212112213.36b38078f569.I8546a20c80bc1669058eb453e213630b846e107b@changeid Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/mac80211/cfg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c index fa293feef935..677928bf13d1 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c @@ -2906,14 +2906,14 @@ static int ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask(struct wiphy *wiphy, continue; for (j = 0; j < IEEE80211_HT_MCS_MASK_LEN; j++) { - if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j]) { + if (sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xff) { sdata->rc_has_mcs_mask[i] = true; break; } } for (j = 0; j < NL80211_VHT_NSS_MAX; j++) { - if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j]) { + if (sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xffff) { sdata->rc_has_vht_mcs_mask[i] = true; break; } -- 2.30.1