Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 052/221] nfs: we dont support removing system.nfs4_acl
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:56:23 +0200
Message-Id: <20210329075630.916357973@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210329075629.172032742@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20210329075629.172032742@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 4f8be1f53bf615102d103c0509ffa9596f65b718 ]

The NFSv4 protocol doesn't have any notion of reomoving an attribute, so
removexattr(path,"system.nfs4_acl") doesn't make sense.

There's no documented return value.  Arguably it could be EOPNOTSUPP but
I'm a little worried an application might take that to mean that we
don't support ACLs or xattrs.  How about EINVAL?

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index ba2dfba4854b..15ac6b6893e7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5891,6 +5891,9 @@ static int __nfs4_proc_set_acl(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, size_t bufl
 	unsigned int npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(buflen, PAGE_SIZE);
 	int ret, i;
 
+	/* You can't remove system.nfs4_acl: */
+	if (buflen == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	if (!nfs4_server_supports_acls(server))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	if (npages > ARRAY_SIZE(pages))
-- 
2.30.1