Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281488AbRKHI4r>; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 03:56:47 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281487AbRKHI4i>; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 03:56:38 -0500
Received: from cc78409-a.hnglo1.ov.nl.home.com ([212.120.97.185]:28676 "EHLO
	dexter.hensema.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S281486AbRKHI4X>; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 03:56:23 -0500
From: spamtrap@use.reply-to (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.
Date: 8 Nov 2001 08:56:21 GMT
Message-ID: <slrn9uki5k.174.spamtrap@dexter.hensema.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <F218Wqr2f9hYDkngMUJ00002181@hotmail.com> <20011108002705.A45912@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
Reply-To: erik@hensema.net
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk) wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:41:26PM -0500, William Knop wrote:
>
>> You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of 
>> organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part 
>> of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is 
>> messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat.
>
>Like cleaning your room, talking endlessly about how doesn't get you anywhere.
>Show some code ...

Just starting to code without giving much thought into it give us... the
current /proc. It may be a good idea to actually design the thing this
time.

-- 
Erik Hensema (erik@hensema.net)
I'm on the list, no need to Cc: me, though I appreciate one if your
mailer doesn't support the References header.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/