Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3463265pxf; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:59:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwesJQ50ESNQYl9HZ2BuhTqUjlTkNgGxflt6mg6aDQz1DqeMz9gLslcrjIHYtWToIkXGQku X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c14a:: with SMTP id r10mr26658236edp.132.1617011964879; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:59:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617011964; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EFor4IQy0frHs2iaFF/gAJURfVoRPyWfSgUsTC1r2a+NLBAJEbRlLIAdCePAvt8K1g eYj+H0hL4aQpn8eEMZTXKbdyW/lkqXcrl4Or2Ye9kCrXO1vijJTpMg8vJ2y7t0XqEhwW j5DMHrg9rqG1FaZo+RjPvoLF6+hHRbRSj8cUOSrsZMzoWyulgGwmsnzRcFVtJ7Kb0pGs NuybKjF+vUfwd66G40rm5ecEdQkTEp5vZqXtUekRjOTpVxgiecIcQDaDaxRXL1PL9dRr 9WIfhp58iJbyuWnUMCjb64FnHBmJ7VxgOd/mioJjwjGCgF7IA+qn8u+qGxHTbpdarmnt RBAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=/TxZye4/Hu8uIyAyFOXSED4o2sCKVRpCpOWqX8q9jJk=; b=w1nbJJPxyPrVmphhJx0jA4TwWNURHXDtgCiEmcZZL7QSxqYVRM6PxODXW+7kFpbzgr 7TnfdkKdurm4CcXTvQ/cgdwAfPZh3kR4jdUCuTc1ObH3qVl8xeaLoueeeUmt4DapA8FZ rD6Y8Q2qA2jwMQclho47WT7yzzgnCAouIEXanox9nGklMW1+Z9zEHZHGPR3q6L74K86N 5q7NFe8bibAaJSjkELryQLcgMuc7UJmpmPtlAItF/TwED4sgSA6RVnm/sD2A8LipnqJh 8o2YlVNmSyVZxP7/eYf5X8+onbd16wYUdi0ZvPl7Kx4VgOZrEUnudumZrH1ZnRRWbY+x xdig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=q48GVPqh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c11si12567045ejs.584.2021.03.29.02.59.02; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=q48GVPqh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232282AbhC2J5j (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:57:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232168AbhC2J5S (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:57:18 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441DBC061574 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:57:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/TxZye4/Hu8uIyAyFOXSED4o2sCKVRpCpOWqX8q9jJk=; b=q48GVPqhqcqlFe3D5Rdz/xZtag k5cM5qHiSFhG3NEhrVb+F4M3BRDvDN1GZUJSRTxWmIKRzjwd4ybiGAtJ95Wb1j5qIB9Klkw87rgVf /sYazUSfkTfw1ATbhFJ+NkVa6ExZIYXhHXV6fXZG4U9rWwUFWong1Wt3JDs4iI/smchtgSsmHR0sa YORcQdaH1JqsoxMX/O/rdfpa+RKu/WFcI1Iz/1AY5W4eQ4n41hju9cEp8B2yGgW5TFu5B+FrSqx50 oJSzvSvTZ+B7V+LRJUlOBdRgeX0VcXXaJ+ytchsV01kMK8J9DF/qdfgLBR6Yj4YuapojsD2Pd5xhk 3b2TejTA==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lQocJ-000Yeh-W0; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:55:30 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589523007CD; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38AA920709457; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:24 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Josh Don Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , Nishanth Aravamudan , Julien Desfossez , Tim Chen , Vineeth Pillai , Aaron Lu , Aubrey Li , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, Kees Cook , Phil Auld , Valentin Schneider , Mel Gorman , Pawan Gupta , Paolo Bonzini , vineeth@bitbyteword.org, Chen Yu , Christian Brauner , Agata Gruza , Antonio Gomez Iglesias , graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dfaggioli@suse.com, Steven Rostedt , benbjiang@tencent.com, Alexandre Chartre , James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, OWeisse@umich.edu, Dhaval Giani , "Hyser,Chris" , Hao Luo , Tom Lendacky , dhiatt@digitalocean.com Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 2/8] sched: core scheduling tagging infrastructure Message-ID: References: <20210324214020.34142-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20210324214020.34142-3-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20210327000943.GQ4746@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:19:57PM -0700, Josh Don wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:10 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I've spend the past few hours rewriting patches #2 and #3, and adapting > > #4. The thing was working before I added SHARE_FROM back and introduced > > GET, but now I'm seeing a few FAILs from the selftest. > > > > I'm too tired to make sense of anything much, or even focus my eyes > > consistently, so I'll have to prod at it some more next week, but I've > > pushed out the lot to my queue.git: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=sched/core-sched > > Thanks, I'll take a look next week. OK, fixed the fails. My tired head made it unconditionally return the cookie-id of 'current' instead of task. Pushed out an update. > > Also, we really need a better name than coretag.c. > > Yea, we don't really otherwise use the phrase "tagging". core_sched.c > is probably too confusing given we have sched/core.c. Right, so I tried core_sched and my fingers already hate it as much as kernel/scftorture.c (which I'd assumed my fingers would get used to eventually, but noooo). Looking at kernel/sched/ C is very overrepresented, so we really don't want another I think. B, E, G, H, J, K, N, seem to still be available in the first half of the alphabet. Maybe, bonghits.c, gabbleduck.c ?