Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3598150pxf; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFupSlf4Jw3OukOmotinWJyjDwfKlaSGyRxbKgWHHP0Ea/Y/xLFXUu+rxiu+uwimcwqTF8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1691:: with SMTP id a17mr28823882edv.336.1617025161360; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617025161; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w1XVTMb5Zy+RykFww39jFKGZMtx7g4QIzS4j1PIUWCmaVOZ/ojmbvbyBSfLlm2gfwO XYpq9f8IqWw3IGVkpOEPnmK115Ti/nLO7C7AXtSUIaZIp6h0wtXTFYzM56RIi0mkP4y0 YgLXp3iNA7WfLxjwgX4++XJeNPRadnKiCJolPEdfPJPpj7KxWYMT8h+gJ0acFxSRCQCL NQeoxw36DuwYGwwwAPXmfBS/IqvDZcEzOCG2DiQDtWu4Hz9R7ky4TsSuUxlmvZRx+Y2P CF6VHwwyomTNqUvjWXtBkXhuQHkjxGLDLvbpF2LBv+YMBA59ewV4PkEvUmU3EvMMR0tZ mK5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=KMAOz6FWKqfoD0tmhYebqv1mFMpPW58KqSd4BZJuEko=; b=J92Pvtxv/vTLm1NDvktDB1VBimJmyhy7UWQ0Ejrq0RogbYey130TsDB1N6hoJLMAJ/ goiSN3/swGeIavI0PtY/Xc9vIJqRpWroAdaNYsKe9hlXlOOEYM5T6If+VNcjfpcaG2rR 8kJJvReaT/zRRLecQsZJFFphTf16w0NJP29hAmYX9kwTXRRKy12zV5nwGJv3RAvC5ub7 mSFa+pcX4z08INexHHZ4jW/b1GImDXeVq4v8n0mdZjPeQYd1YW+OpF4zUms26JA1OqjN 7pfG2V5wEYWEqWEE4YM3U6tacHurFc71fX+lHEjk/ftHYuaG0v3ScN9yydZ0iJHvZFj2 EKjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g27si13436729ejc.32.2021.03.29.06.38.58; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231809AbhC2NiA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:38:00 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:15384 "EHLO szxga06-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231839AbhC2Nhy (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:37:54 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F8D9t0FKLzlW3Q; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:36:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.40.192.162) by DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:37:39 +0800 Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1616846904-25719-1-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "Zhang, Rui" , Bjorn Helgaas , "ACPI Devel Maling List" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , From: Xiaofei Tan Message-ID: <6c4f84ca-1a31-d2a7-5566-0e5fea408181@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:37:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.40.192.162] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On 2021/3/29 20:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan wrote: >> >> Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl. >> Only cleanup and no function changes. >> >> Differences from v2 to v3: >> - Remove the modifications that may cause function change. >> >> Differences from v1 to v2: >> - Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15. >> - Change to use more proper module name for some patch names. >> >> Xiaofei Tan (12): >> ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue >> ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues >> ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function >> ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations >> ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations >> ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues >> ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues >> ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues >> ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue >> ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations >> ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues >> ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues >> >> drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++--- >> drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 - >> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++ >> drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 +++ >> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++-------- >> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++---- >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- >> drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +- >> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 ++ >> drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++--- >> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++-- >> 12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) >> >> -- > > Can you please stop sending new versions of this for a while? > OK. > You've sent three of them over the last weekend and honestly I haven't > had a chance to look at the first one even. I tried to fix a low-level mistake as quickly as possible. I'm sorry for that > _______________________________________________ > Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org > To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org >