Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3650876pxf; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5ezKDjc7EKZl6OCD0kbIJTKAzwtX+12ixNmOUMgLX71e1+pPejT0eICThohMQo8/WKZLn X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3d8d:: with SMTP id he13mr29360439ejc.530.1617029742502; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617029742; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lBXOCjAA47bDHgJnWqEtDVgn+u6YEYBGHfe0cCagwfYCamFrh/9nGnYGtzAwAu6ZPq e96H/O4s6mXTI4x0pmnihsT4GPTmeuOIHDOzChnMSW0u9ykrGXj6TDjrLkpbMudrI1HJ Xokt0pgSo1JVzXp93Wvib9jnxqV2Kh0MXsVkT0EPATRctAdurts6c2kp0rv0ODXjBYuB XmDXRSR6OfdI7AaLduMj+BpoGAhI7TmT4lFjsnf0zO6P5J1JFoINbb2DEdeSE5o+Wn5m ULe1BXzDfl/nDS39iTfAoHV7Xq8TTovrBfAKjmW79KtMTrUOWiXAca+32HjlzX0zh1l+ Bzfg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=ysRL09lU1RWgeOpgm7ZydoIVR6+RnJAkH2hO2tyHP8E=; b=P+PmL3PKCAI50iT7wfnsjg2I4bpDF0CfuoFSsb1KWrbSkVt1UM8KnV2oAYJAiifCJt JfyCbyUVV14pJ+KKz/S8BHFpC4jJxA5fLnT5l0o9IsjqEYxepJP5/suYXWjF8x86CqYg SNHVVTjR/4hCI7tpctUDfGQvAOeSNzB9XNVhNfcUIV90BnHKciAq/GCMKaiviEYyZ0AW KuhT+L9g68y7dJHVuvEY968JKUsQ4ym+breVjDScho9Rl3eXq7QbnBdxjnbRWgebonHr EsESjk+9le3bi0g70rTTFI0BVAUqaOAWQHgf90x66gRlmDDRFz8PW8Z+uwrcmPxqaGJT zXiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=EyXqJgLh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s10si13573143edi.563.2021.03.29.07.55.20; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=EyXqJgLh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231145AbhC2Ova (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:51:30 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42326 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231434AbhC2OvB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:51:01 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7B2C61932; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:50:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617029460; bh=CNpOXw8lVzu5h03kCKJA5hVce5TYus6KlINeK8XkzRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EyXqJgLhA585RYY/VmTB96DvW+AVS6g5pjyW/s0kPWCtxGKRNKNzPagUvTi3WJmwh BAae2KXVXBvVN977z+WjNtKN7+w1NmySHFUKNq9TzTupDUr/sQMbo2n+JVmPx2KNJ5 1XxxT+Amj0AhNkWtyk8CTDAisij00HrdUMLcP1941mAd798wr5m/kEQQAZ7GU9Fawy ++R/GGmeJa1RSgmQ6qWzLm7RhwBpV9beSwiw1meQT5Fk7ohoLHHKc5I7RWnvHEWt/2 JMMS5R8GngzNs5e/c04Czy+pLpd9aOQ+DwZmAi5BswVOvvLfgOcPYk5rxmude980tZ xipUAAKUybe0g== Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:50:56 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Nikitas Angelinas Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: initialize osq lock in __MUTEX_INITIALIZER() Message-ID: <20210329145055.GC4203@willie-the-truck> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:15:16AM -0700, Nikitas Angelinas wrote: > Since __MUTEX_INITIALIZER() is used on memory that is initialized to 0 > anyway this change should not have an effect, but it seems better to > initialize osq explicitly for completeness, as done in other macros and > functions that initialize mutex and rwsem. > > Signed-off-by: Nikitas Angelinas > --- > include/linux/mutex.h | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h > index 515cff7..bff47f8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mutex.h > +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h > @@ -129,10 +129,18 @@ do { \ > # define __DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER > +# define __OSQ_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \ > + , .osq = OSQ_LOCK_UNLOCKED > +#else > +# define __OSQ_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) > +#endif > + > #define __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \ > { .owner = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0) \ > , .wait_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname.wait_lock) \ > , .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(lockname.wait_list) \ > + __OSQ_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \ You don't need the lockname parameter for this macro. Will