Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:35:41 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>, od@zcrc.me,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary
 plane
Message-ID: <20210329153541.a3yil2aqsrtf2nlj@gilmour>
References: <20210327112214.10252-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
 <20210329140731.tvkfxic4fu47v3rz@gilmour>
 <S1LQQQ.K5HO8ISMBGA02@crapouillou.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ox5m2kdae4pdeh7p"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <S1LQQQ.K5HO8ISMBGA02@crapouillou.net>
Precedence: bulk


--ox5m2kdae4pdeh7p
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>=20
> Le lun. 29 mars 2021 =E0 16:07, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> a =E9cr=
it :
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:22:14AM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > >  The ingenic-drm driver has two mutually exclusive primary planes
> > >  already; so the fact that a CRTC must have one and only one primary
> > >  plane is an invalid assumption.
> >=20
> > I mean, no? It's been documented for a while that a CRTC should only
> > have a single primary, so I'd say that the invalid assumption was that
> > it was possible to have multiple primary planes for a CRTC.
>=20
> Documented where?
>=20
> I did read the doc of "enum drm_plane_type" in <drm/drm_plane.h>, and the
> DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY describes my two planes, so I went with that.

At least since 4.9, this was in the documentation generated for DRM:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.9.263/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.=
c#L43

Maxime

--ox5m2kdae4pdeh7p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCYGHzzQAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xSgcAQDa8LPGxsVyYp+FHXSppe9HTW99P41ux9jSeGDbunQB9AD+LqQ/2UIcPOcb
uFrNSAR7loZGx5J70GpTipxYKy6/FgQ=
=OPxg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ox5m2kdae4pdeh7p--